(Extract from)
Everything You've Always
Wanted to Know About the Church of God,
International, and Weren’t Afraid to Ask
The Infamous
Systematic Theology Project
When founded in 1978,
the small group of ministers who formed the first "Ministerial Council"
of the church adopted the Systematic Theology Project of
the parent organization as the primary statement of doctrines.
If and when further doctrinal study proved necessary, it was to be the
matrix out of which all such study would proceed.
One of the major
charges made against me by my father was that I had begun "watering
down doctrine." He never specified which doctrines. He never
called me, or wrote to me, or handed to me a single article, booklet,
or paper in which he had pointed out or underscored any such attempts
at "watering down."
Instead, he pointed
to the Systematic Theology Project, and wrote that
he had "never seen it," alleging that it was somehow slipped in as a
statement of doctrinal belief without his ever knowing about it. This
was simply untrue.
Just what is the Systematic
Theology Project? Here is the answer, as well as how the Systematic
Theology Project began:
For many years, I had
been very visible as the only speaker on The World Tomorrow radio
and television programs. Continually, I was sought out by reporters,
religious writers, and talk-show hosts.
Whenever I would go
to cities in the
Naturally, I was
called upon to be the "defender of the faith." Since the doctrines of
the church appeared to be extreme to most; since
we observed such strange-sounding things as the weekly Sabbath, the
annual holy days, avoidance of unclean meats and the like, we were
mostly considered to be a cult. In many ways, if not in most ways, we
were, during the two or three decades prior to my ouster, closely
resembling a cult, but only in the sense that my father's word, his
tastes, his ideas about attire, and his decisions regarding personnel
and doctrine carried the force of law.
It was one-man rule,
and that rule was "in perpetuity." He had the power to fire members of
the board of the church in his "sole subjective discretion."
Chillingly, he had
the power to remove any board member "with or without cause," and without
notice. That is TOTAL power, the power to rule by caprice or
whim. There were no "checks and balances."
There were no safety
nets, no apparatus for redress of grievances, and little, if any,
latitude for doctrinal or administrative change.
I was the one who
continually had to defend the organization before the media.
Talk show hosts,
before asking me on, would invariably "do their homework" by research
which would turn up any number of books, booklets, and articles written
about and against "Armstrongism."
Sometimes, such books were wildly off target.
I would comment,
"It's bad enough to be persecuted for what you really believe and practice,
but even worse to be persecuted for things you do
not believe!
My father never
granted interviews. He was completely shielded from all such attacks.
How well I remember reading one particularly lengthy segment of a book
about "cults" and commenting to my friends, and to a talk-show host,
"The only thing I disagree with in that chapter is the plural s
on the end of the name 'Armstrong.'" The writer had attacked
practice and financial policies, not doctrines.
Because of all this,
it became obvious to me that researchers, either friend or foe, were
constrained to discover the doctrines and practices of the WCG by
sorting through hundreds of old Plain Truth, Good News, or
Tomorrow's World magazines; by reading dozens of
old "Co-Worker" letters, or scanning the dozens of booklets and
correspondence course lessons distributed by the church. Who
could go to such lengths? Where were located archives, available to the
public, containing thousands of such documents?
Nowhere was there a
volume which was labeled "Doctrines and Covenants" of the church. The
church had no published statement of belief. It had no single booklet,
pamphlet, or book which stated its doctrines. Embarrassingly, there had
been many serious errors. Doctrines, especially those relating to
prophecy and predictions, had been changed. Elaborate prophetic
scenarios had utterly failed.
But no apologies were
made. The errors were simply ignored, and articles in the 1970s made no
mention whatever of the dire predictions of the 1950s and
1960s, or of an elaborate timetable for the Great Tribulation and the
Day of the Lord which proved to be totally false.
For over two decades,
the church taught that God's plan revolved around "19-year time
cycles." According to the oft-repeated beliefs of the church, the
When 1972 came and
went, instead of "bombs falling
on
Antagonists were
quick to discover these anomalies, and point them out.
In order to solve
some of these difficulties, and because it was at least two decades
overdue, I wanted to formalize our
doctrines and beliefs.
The project was
discussed by several of our leading theologians and a couple of my
aides. We then wrote to the entire
ministry of the church, informing them of the ongoing Systematic Theology Project, and
invited all of them to contribute any papers, articles, or technical,
biblical exegesis they wished.
Meanwhile, we asked
some of our best editorial researchers to pull together all those old
magazines, letters, and correspondence courses, and create a synthesis
for each doctrinal subject which represented the best current
thinking and teaching within the ministry on every doctrine.
We began with the
doctrine of who God is;
with major articles on Jesus Christ, our belief in the Bible,
salvation, conversion, baptism, the Holy Spirit, tithing, and the like.
Little by little, the
Systematic Theology Project (and
that was all it was, an ongoing project, involving
the best minds in our college theology faculties, and the most astute
and well-versed of our ministry in the doctrines of the
church) took shape.
We were expecting to
conduct a major ministerial conference in the auditorium on the
Be reminded, the STP
had nothing to do whatever with
attempting to effect doctrinal
revision. It was merely an effort to compile a
comprehensive statement of beliefs for
the church, so that either friendly researchers, such as students in
the college or laymen, or antagonistic researchers, such as news
reporters or writers for other religious publications, could have, in
one large volume (we knew it would eventually grow to several volumes),
the "Doctrines and Covenants" of the Worldwide Church of God.
I clearly remember
(and there are several living witnesses who can testify to this)
holding the pages of the articles concerning such things as tithing,
divorce, healing, and the like on my father's lap, helping him zero in
on key points, as he read the pages with the help of a large, hand-held
magnifying glass.
He was recuperating
from a protracted bout with congestive heart failure, and could not
leave his home in
He was aware that the
other articles, such as those on the law of God, or who and what is
God, or Jesus Christ, were virtually as he would
have written them; that there was no attempt
being made to "change" anything, but that we were merely compiling a comprehensive doctrinal
statement.
He knew about the
project, for I had gotten his approval for it. He knew about our
ongoing research into old magazines and letters, for he read each issue
of the Pastor-General's Report which
was sent to the ministry, or the Worldwide
News, a church newspaper I had started, in which
we were continually updating the ministry and the church on the
project, and soliciting their input.
He read,
asked questions, commented about major segments of the
work, and knew exactly what we intended producing. He saw much of it
with his own eyes; had the documents on his lap.
By the time the
conference was about to begin, we had to rush to bring the first step
of the project to completion. We had only a small number of the
doctrines of the church really complete. The others were only
introductions, bare bones statements, lacking thorough exegesis and
biblical proofs.
Finally, the brown Naugahyde-covered, loose-leaf binders arrived, and we
were able to pass out hundreds of them to the ministry assembled in the
auditorium.
How well I remember
being at a table on the platform with several others of our
research team as we passed out the document. The hundreds of assembled
ministers were told, "You will notice it is in loose-leaf binders. That
is because it is incomplete, and we will be publishing additional
in-depth articles on our doctrines which can be added to your books
later."
My father was still
quite weak, but he managed to come to
I was absolutely
astounded a couple of months later, and continued to be
astounded after my ouster, as my father wrote a barrage of attacks
against "liberals" in the church; defamed the STP, and claimed it was
"watering down doctrine."
He accused me of ramrodding the documents
through, and said, "I had never seen it!" This was
blatantly false. He had never seen the brown leather-like cover in
which the STP was contained, but he had seen, and held in his
own hands, and read much of the material,
He wrote, and told
the church and the ministry, that the STP was to be completely banned.
Ministers were ordered to turn in their copies. It
was to be destroyed.