JESUS WEDNESDAY DEATH
To those who believe that Jesus died
on a Friday and rose on a Sunday it may seem quite natural that both
the weekly and annual sabbaths co-incided in the year that Jesus died,
but as there is strong evidence that Jesus died in AD31 it indicates
that the first day of Unleavened Bread was not a Saturday but that it
was a Thursday.
The portrayal of the Passover on Nisan 14 at the time
of the Exodus of the children of Israel from Egypt (Ex 12:6) can
be shown to have occurred on a Wednesday by referring to Ex 16:1 which
shows the 15th day of the second month was a sabbath day, for that
evening the quails came (v13) and in the morning the manna appeared
which they gathered for 6 days (v5, v22) which was followed by another
sabbath (v23) so counting back 15 days to the beginning of the second
month and 16 days back to Nisan 14 shows the
Passover was on a Wednesday.
As this typological event is used to
picture Jesus as the Passover lamb (1 Cor 5:7) and the surrounding
events such as the crossing of the Sea are used as typological symbols
(1Cor 10:1-4, Heb 11:28-29) then it shows by this symbolism that from
the killing of the Passover lamb until the escape of the Israelites
into the watery grave of the Sea which pictures the death and
resurrection of Jesus from Joseph's sepulchre and the appearance on
Sunday morning which was the Wave-sheaf day then this symbolism shows
there to have been a full three days and nights between Wednesday until
Saturday, the Sabbath
day.
The prophecy of Daniel 2:27 says "in the midst of the week he shall
cause the sacrifice and oblation to cease." Some think this
refers to Antiochus the 4th while others think it refers to Jesus.
Counting back three full days and three full nights from when Jesus is
said to have already been resurrected "on" the first day of the week would be
from Wednesday night.
The Greek of Matt 28:1 uses the plural for sabbaths indicating that it
included both a weekly and an annual sabbath.
The Gospel of Peter shows that the Passover day on which Jesus died was
at least 2 days before the weekly sabbath (v7).
The 364 day Qumran calendar which began each year on a Wednesday
results in the Passover (Nisan 14) falling on a Tuesday each year but
it is not clear if they kept the Passover at the beginning or end of
the 14th so it may have been kept on either a Monday or Tuesday evening
each year.
The Syriac Didiscalia says Jesus held the supper on a Tuesday night.
(Finegan p288) Didascalia Apostolorum by R H Connolly p184.
Epiphanius also records the arrest of Jesus on a Tuesday night after he
had eaten the supper, which follows the same pattern, and says that it
was "-two days before it ought to have been eaten,-" (Panarion,
51:26:1, 27:1)
The Gospel of Nicodemus gives the Julian date for the death of Jesus in
the fourth year of the two hundred and second Olympiad, which was a
Wednesday.
Anatolius of Alexandria says that the 17th of Nisan "co-incided with
the day on which the Lord rose from the dead." (Ch 11), (which was a
sabbath, not a Sunday) which shows AD31 being the most probable year
for Nisan 14 having been a Wednesday. If the Passover had been on a
Friday then according to Anatolius the resurrection would have been on
Monday.
The Julian calendar date given by Lactantius, an advisor to Constantine
is also a Wednesday. (The Institutes 4:10) and later when writing to
Donatus he says "in the latter days of the Emperor Tiberius in the
consulship of Ruberius Geminus and on the tenth of the kalends of
April, as I find written, Jesus was crucified by the Jews."(The Manner
in which the Persecutors died, Ch 2, A-N, Vol 7 p301) The Julian
calendar again shows that this was a Wednesday.
Tertullian (AD145-220) gives a date for the death of Jesus being killed
"on the eighth day before the Kalends of April" in the consulate of
Rubellius Geminus and Fifius Geminus (A-N, Vol 3, p160) This date on
the Julian calendar was Friday March 25 in AD29, but the first full
moon following the equinox was at 1.37pm on Saturday April 17 in AD29,
and the Passover began that evening, because using the lunar calendar
the date of the passover was on Sunday April 18, so this date that
Tertullian gives us cannot be correct.
All these Roman dates generally support that Jesus died on a Wednesday
and they also all agree that it was in the month of March.
Epiphanius gives dates given by different people all of which were in
March, 18th, 20th, 23rd, 25th and 29th. (Panarion Ch 50:1, 51:25)
WAS
THE PASSOVER AT THE BEGINNING OR THE END OF NISAN 14 ? In
Fred Coulters book called "The Christian Passover" and
in his audio tape (153) "Scriptural Truth About Passover O.T." he
quotes Exod 16 and says the Passover was kept at the beginning of Nisan
14 and claims that the Hebrew word "erev" means "sunset", (tape 1, side
2) but the word "sunset" is not used here in Ex 16. He also claims that
"beyn ha erevim" means the period of twilight between sunset and dark,
and those who teach that the Passover is to be kept otherwise, are
false prophets who should not be listened to, (tape 2, side 2)
Firstly "erev" does not necessarily mean "sunset".
Leviticus 22:6 uses the term "ha shemesh" when showing that a person
who was unclean until "sunset", could then eat in "the evening", (ha
erev) which shows here that "ha erev" follows sunset, not that "ha erev" is
sunset. Deuteronomy 23:11 is similar but adds, "when evening comes on,
he shall bathe himself in water, and when the sun is down, he may come
within the camp.", showing the reverse, that "evening comes on" before sunset.
Raymond Cole on p14 of "Passover and Pentecost" quotes 2
Chron 18:33-4 which refers to both even and sundown to show that "the
even" was also sunset, "the king of Israel stayed himself up in his
chariot against the Syrians until the even: (erev) and about the time
of the sun going down he died", but as he was still alive until the
"even" but died later at about sunset, then even was before sunset.
Herb Solinsky points to 1 Kings 18:36 and to Jeremiah 6:4
"Woe to us, for the day declines, for the SHADOWS of evening lengthen
-" showing that the sun can still be shining after evening has begun.
(Servants News, July 1997 p6)
Youngs concordance under "even" gives a list of ten places
where the term "beyn ha erevim" is used in the Hebrew bible. It is only
found in Exodus, Leviticus and Numbers. Six do not relate to the
Passover, Exod 16:12, 29:39, 41, 30:8, Num 28:4,8. There are only five
places where the Passover on Nisan 14 is mentioned and the term "beyn
ha erevim" is used, they are: Ex 12:6, Lev 23:5, Numbers 9:3, 5 and the
second Passover in Numbers 9:11.
There are three places where "beyn ha erevim" is not used
but instead only "erev" is used, these are: Ex 12:18, Deut 16:6, and
Josh 5:10, so it should be obvious that both "erev" and "beyn ha
erevim" can be used interchangeably.
Lev 23:5 uses the term "beyn ha erevim" when it says "in
the fourteenth of the first month at even is the Lords Passover", while
in Ex 12:18 where "erev" is used instead of "beyn ha erevim" it says
"In the first month on the fourteenth day of the month at even ye shall
eat unleavened bread, until the one and twentieth day of the month at
even."
Joshua 5:10 says "and the children of Israel encamped in
Gilgal, and kept the passover on the fourteenth day of the month at
even (erev) in the plains of Jericho, this shows the Israelites kept the
Passover in the "erev" as "beyn ha erevim" is not used.
Coulter claims Ezra later edited this verse and that it
means the first day of Unleavened Bread, he says "the day referred to
as the `passover' in Joshua 5:10 had to be both a weekly Sabbath and
one of the seven days of the Feast of Unleavened Bread. Undoubtedly,
Ezra was the one who edited this verse to reflect the terminology of
his day when he was compiling the Old Testament records." (TCP
p169-170), but this is not necessarily so as the Passover on the 14th
could have been a Sabbath, and the first day of Unleavened Bread, and
the Wavesheaf day could have coincided with each other on Sunday the
15th. Others follow the sequence
of the Exodus
pattern.
Neither "erev" or "beyn ha erevim" are strictly defined
but can be shown to refer to the period before, at or after sunset and
the intended meaning of the writer must be understood as much as
possible in each place where it is used.
Genesis 1:5 shows each day starts and ends with the "erev"
not with "beyn ha erevim" so for the days to both begin and end at
"erev" the term must mean "sunset" or include the period both before
and after sunset, so the argument is probably how long before sunset
could it start to be called "erev" when the Passover was to be killed.
The word "erev" is said to come from the word "arab" and
means mixture, to intermix, mingle, mongrel race, the web, transverse
threads of cloth, dusk, day, eveningtide, night, etc (from the
Wordstudy Dictionary) William Gesenius gives:- enter, go in,
sunset, withdraw, place of sunset, west; western, evening, sunset. For
"beyn ha erevim" he says:- between the two evenings, "i.e. prob between
sunset and dark" (Hebrew and English Lexicon) In his Hebrew/Chald'
Lexicon he says "evening (m. and fem., 1 Sam. 20:5) Plur, arvyth Jerem.
5:6. Dual arvym the two evenings; only in the phrase beyn ha arvym
between the two evenings, Ex 16:12; 30:8; used as marking the space of
time during which the paschal lamb was slain, Ex 12:6; Lev 23:5; Nu 9:3
and the evening sacrifice was offered, Ex 29:39, 41; Num 28:4; i.e.
according to the opinion of the Karaites and Samaritans (which is favoured by the
words of Deut. 16:6), the time between sunset and deep twilight. The
Pharisees, however (see Joseph. Bellum Jud. [Wars] 6:9:3), and the
Rabbinists considered the time when the sun began to descend to be
called the first evening (Arab. little evening; when it begins to draw
towards evening; Gr deile proia); and the second evening to be the real
sunset (Gr. deile ofia). See Bochart, Hieroz., t.I.p.559. Compare, as
the double morning, Pococke ad Carm. Tograi, p71; and Hebr. pr. n
shacharim. (p652, 492.4321/GES)
"Eustathius, in a note on the seventeenth book of the
Odyssey, shows that the Greeks too held that there were two evenings,
one which they called the latter evening at the close of the day; and
the other the former evening, which commenced immediately after noon."
(GTA, Easter or Passover, p22-3)
Kitto's Encyclopedia of Biblical Literature explains that
"even" means the leveling of the sun from midday, and that
"tradition...interprets the phrase between the two evenings to mean
from the afternoon to the disappearing of the sun, the first evening
being from the time when the sun begins to decline from its vertical or
noontime point towards the west; and the second from its going down and
vanishing out of sight which is the reason why the daily sacrifice
might be killed at 12:30 p.m. on a Friday. (Mishna, Pesachim, 5:1,-)"
Kimchi says "Between the two evenings is from the time
when the sun begins to incline towards the west, which is from the
sixth hour (12 o'clock) and upwards. It is called between the two
evenings because there are two evenings, for from the time that the sun
begins to decline is one evening, and the other evening is after the
sun has gone down, and it is the space between which is meant by
between the two evenings."
Anatolius of Alexandria said that it was towards evening
on the fourteenth the lamb was sacrificed among the Jews. (A-N Vol 6,
Ch 16, p151)
Rashi's Commentary says "The period beginning at six hours
- is called beyn ha erevim, because the sun then inclines in the
direction of the place of its setting to become darkened. The
expression beyn ha erevim appears to me to denote those hours which are
between the darkening of the day and the darkening of the night. The
darkening of the day is at the beginning of the seventh hour of the
day, - this period is therefore from noon until the beginning of
night." (p53b)
Exodus 12:18 says "In the first month, on the fourteenth
day of the month at EVEN, (erev) ye shall eat unleavened bread, until
the one and twentieth day of the month at even." There are only
seven days of unleavened bread so if "erev" was at the beginning of the
14th there would be eight days, unless people are allowed to eat leavened
bread on the last day of Unleavened Bread, which is plainly
contradictory. Deut 16:8 says "Six days thou shalt eat unleavened
bread: and on the seventh day shall be a solemn assembly to the Lord
thy God:-" As this says "six days" it shows that the first day of
unleavened bread was Nisan 15 and confirms that there are only seven
days of unleavened bread. As the Passover was a symbolic sacrifice for
sin, it was to be offered without leaven (Ex 34:25) and was eaten with
unleavened bread, symbolising sincerity and truth (1 Cor 5:8). It would
be contradictory to eat leavened bread which is symbolic of hypocrisy
(Lk 12:1) the teaching of the Pharisees and Sadducees, (Matt 16:12, and
Herod, Mk 8:15) and sin, on the day of the fourteenth if the passover
was killed at the start of the fourteenth, but there is no restriction
on eating leavened bread on the passover day.
It became Jewish practice for the Jews to stop eating
leaven at 10am on the 14th and to destroy the remainder at noon.
(Edersheim, The Temple, p221) Lev 23:32 uses "erev" and says,
"in
the ninth of the month at even", which means at the END of the ninth,
which is at the beginning of the 10th of Tishri and Ex 12:18 says
"-until the one and twentieth day of the month at even", which shows
that "even" is not at the beginning, but is at the END of the twenty
first day, as it is in John 20:19 "On the evening of that day," meaning
at the end, so following these examples the Passover is at the END of
the 14th day, otherwise then following Coulters view, if the Passover
was to be kept at the beginning of the 14th, it would say that the
Passover was to be kept on the 13th day at even.
Ex 12:6 uses "beyn ha erevim" and Ex 12:18 uses "erev", so
as "erev" or "evening" can mean before, during or after sunset and as
it can also be used interchangeably with "beyn ha erevim" then it too
can also mean before, at or after sunset. Numbers 28:3-8 says
two
male lambs were to be offered each DAY "-one lamb you shall offer in
the morning, and the other lamb you shall offer in the evening;" (beyn
ha erevim) if the evening sacrifice was offered between sunset and dark
it would not be within the same day, so it had to be offered before
sunset showing that here beyn ha erevim is before sunset. (GTA
"Passover" tape, 1999)
It says in Deuteronomy 16:4-6 "And there shall be no
leavened bread seen with thee in all thy coast SEVEN days; neither
shall there anything of the flesh, which thou SACRIFICED THE FIRST DAY
at even, remain all night until the morning. Thou mayest not sacrifice
the passover within any of thy gates, which the Lord thy God giveth
thee: but at the place which the Lord thy God shall choose to place his
name in, there thou shalt sacrifice the passover at even, (ba erev) at
the going down of the sun, at the season that thou camest forth out of
Egypt." As this "flesh" was "sacrificed the FIRST DAY at even"
which was at the beginning of the feast of Unleavened Bread (Ex 12:15)
and as Nu 28:16 says "in the fourteenth day of the first month is the
Passover of the Lord." then here "even" or "erev" must mean at the END
of the 14th but appears to mean sometime after sunset or following the
sacrifice of the passover which was killed "in the evening" "beyn ha
erevim" (Ex 12:6) so it appears that the term "even" can refer to the
day before, or sometimes to the day following it.
Deut 16:4 says "nor shall any of the flesh which you
sacrifice on the evening of the first day remain all night until
morning." After it had been eaten "let none of it remain
until
the morning, anything that remains until the morning you shall burn."
(Ex 12:10) which was on the first day of Unleavened Bread, so the
passover could not have been killed and eaten at the beginning of the
previous evening which was the beginning of the 14th of Nisan because
this says that none of it was to remain until the morning of the first
day, the 15th of Nisan.
Ex 12:14 says "THIS DAY shall be for you a memorial day,-
on THIS VERY DAY I brought your hosts out of the land of Egypt:" (v17).
"It was a night of watching by the Lord - so THIS SAME NIGHT
is a
night of watching kept to the Lord by all the people of Israel
throughout their generations." (v42) "Remember THIS DAY, in which you
came out from Egypt" (13:3) Moses said to Pharaoh "-I WILL NOT SEE YOUR FACE AGAIN."
(Ex 10:29) but on the night of the Exodus after "midnight" Pharaoh
"summoned Moses and Aaron by night, and said, `Rise up, go forth'-" (Ex
12:29-32) this appears to be a contradiction unless Pharaoh only faced
Aaron while Moses did not see Pharaoh in this night meeting, and did
Pharaoh tell them to `rise up' without them having left their homes and
being present. Did Moses and Pharaoh then spend the following daylight
portion of the 14th hiding from each other?
The Passover was eaten "in haste." (Ex 12:11) as was their
exit shortly afterwards, "And the Egyptians were urgent with the
people, to send them out of the land IN HASTE;" (12:33) Does this mean
that the Israelites were simply just told to leave anytime after
midnight when they felt ready or that the Israelites were given time to
spend all the next day plundering the Egyptians and then assembling in
Rameses before leaving on the following night as those who believe the
passover was killed at the start of the 14th must think. Garner Ted Armstrong points out, why would the Israelites
"playact" by being fully dressed and eating in haste if they were going
to spend all the next day in Egypt. (Easter or the Passover, p28) and
why would they have gone south to Rameses the next day when they could
have fled east immediately?
Some claim that "boquer" can only mean daylight, and
because the Israelites were told "none of you shall go out of the door
of his house until the morning." (Ex 12:22) and that because the
Israelites left Egypt at night then it must have been the following
night, so it is assumed that as it says "morning" that it could not
mean the same night, but Ruth 3:14 says "she lay at his feet until the
morning, but arose before one could recognise another;" so the
Israelites could have left their homes in the "night" before daylight
which was also in "the morning" and would explain how the Israelites
"went out with an high hand in the sight of all the Egyptians, for the
Egyptians buried ALL their firstborn,-" (Nu 33:4). This was also at the
time of the full
moon. Why would the Egyptians have left ALL their firstborn
unburied for over 30 hours until the 15th if they had been killed at
midnight on the 14th? Ex 12:43-51 says "this is the ordinance
of
the passover - no uncircumcised person shall eat of it. - you shall not
carry forth any of the flesh outside the house; and you shall not break
a bone of it - thus did all the people of Israel; as the Lord commanded
Moses and Aaron, so they did. And ON THAT VERY DAY the Lord brought the
people out of the land of Egypt -" after 430 years, this also shows
that the passover could not have been eaten at the beginning of the
14th but at the end of it. Numbers 33:3 says "on the fifteenth day of
the first month; on the morrow after the Passover the children of
Israel went out triumphantly in the sight of all the Egyptians,"
Deut 16:7-8 says "And you shall boil (bashal) it and eat
it at the place which the Lord thy God will choose; and in the morning
you shall turn and go to your tents. For six days you shall eat
unleavened bread; and on the seventh day there shall be a solemn
assembly-"
Coulter and others say that this sacrifice on the "first
day" was not the Passover but was referring to a freewill peace offering
for the feast of Unleavened Bread (Num 10:10, Deut 14:26, 27:7, 2 Chron
30:22) called the "hagigah" or "festivity" (Cole, p29-31) Plaut says that this contrast has caused a good deal of difficulty.
(p1448)
Leviticus 19:5-6 says "When you offer a sacrifice of PEACE
offerings to the Lord, you shall offer it so that you may be accepted.
It shall be eaten the same day you offer it, OR ON THE MORROW; and
anything left over until the third day shall be burned with fire." So
unlike the Passover which was not to remain until the following
morning, peace offerings could remain and be eaten during the following
day.
There are several different types of offerings. Ex 12:5
says the Passover could be "from the sheep or from the goats:"
Leviticus 22:30 says that Thank "todah" offerings could be of the herd,
meaning cattle as well as sheep or goats but just as none of the
Passover was to remain until the morning (Ex 12:10, 23:18 // 34:25)
"-neither shall the sacrifice of the feast of the passover be left
until the morning.", so also Leviticus 7:15, 22:30 says of the "Thank
"offerings, it shall be eaten on the same day, you shall leave none of
it until morning:" The remains of the boiled (bashal) ram of ordination
that were left over until morning were not to be eaten but burnt, (Ex
29:31-34) and there are several other types of offerings but the Peace
"sh'lamim" (from shalom meaning whole) offerings, Lev 3:1, Ezekiel
43:27, like freewill offerings could remain and be eaten on the morrow.
(Lev 7:16)(Plaut, Ht, p199)
Coulter also says the Hebrew term "bashal" in Deut 16:7
means boil and so cannot be referring to the Passover which according
to
Ex 12:8-9 was to be roasted (tsali), "Do not eat any of it raw or
boiled (bashal) with WATER, but roasted" (tsali), but it is the same
word that is used in 2 Chron 35:13 "And they roasted (bashal) the
passover lamb with fire ACCORDING TO THE ORDINANCE; and they boiled
(bashal) the holy offerings in pots, in caldrons, and in pans, and
carried them quickly to all the lay people and afterward they prepared
for themselves and for the priests, because the priests the sons of
Aaron
were busied in offering the burnt offerings and the fat parts until
night;" the first "bashal" is qualified by the word "ba'ash","IN fire",
and means roasted, the second "bashal" as in Deut 16:7 is not qualified
by the word "fire" but means "cooked" but not necessarily boiled. In
Akkadian b-sh-l "refers to several kinds of cooking." (JPS Torah
Commentary on Deut', p155) There is no "ordinance" that the offerings
on the first day were to be roasted or boiled so it can only be
referring to the actual roasting whole of the passover lamb sacrifices.
The unqualified word "bashal" can mean both "boil or "cook" but it is
the intended meaning of the writer in the context that is important.
Also here in 2 Chron 35:9,12 they mention that bulls or oxen were also
sacrificed on the day of the passover at the same time as the Passover
lambs, or soon afterwards and until the night, unless this was both the
same night of eating both the Passover and the sacrifices for the first
day of Unleavened Bread then there was no necessity for the lambs to
have been roasted, perhaps this also helps to better understand how
these offerings could be said to have been made on THE FIRST DAY and to
also be called "Passover" offerings. It appears evident that these
"passover" cattle that were
sacrificed about the same time as the passover sheep and goats were not
required to be roasted as the lambs and the kids were.
The Septuagint translation may be easier to understand as
it is apparent that the N.T. writers followed it more closely than the
Hebrew MS, "And at the passover thou shalt sacrifice to the
Lord thy God, sheep and kine, in the place which the Lord thy God shall
choose for his name to be there invoked. At it thou shalt not eat
leven. Seven days, at it, thou shalt eat unleavened bread - the bread
of affliction, because you came in haste out of Egypt, that you may
remember the day of your coming out of the land of Egypt, all the days
of your life. No leven shall be seen in all thy borders for seven days,
and none of the flesh of that which you shall sacrifice on the evening
of the first day shall be left till the morning." (Deut 16:2-4)
These instructions were not those given for the original
passover but were for how it was to be observed as a memorial. Some say
that it was only for the Exodus passover that the lamb needed to be put
aside on the tenth of the month, (Pes 96a, Rashi Ex 12:3) instead of
traveling they were to rest and keep the day holy, instead of their
houses in Goshen it was where God would choose, instead of only a lamb
or kid it included cattle, etc.
In tape 156 called "Genesis 15 & the Timing of Christs
Death" Coulter says near the end of side 2 that in Deuteronomy 16 we
should substitute" the word "passover" with the words "unleavened
bread" (the Hebrew word in Deut 16 is "pasch" or "passover" not
"unleavened bread") he says "the word Passover was edited into the text
at a later time, apparently by Ezra," (The Christian Passover, p154)
which shows he wants us to twist the scripture to fit his ideas, this
not only breaks the context about the passover in Deut 16:4-6 but also
there was no command that everyone was required to make freewill
offerings on this "night to be much observed", the evening of the first
day, as Deut 16:4-6 would imply if it was read this way.
Irenaeus says that "God - inspired Esdras the priest, of
the tribe of Levi, to recast all the words of the former prophets,-"
(Book 3, Ch 21, A-N Vol 1, p452) "Esdra, as tradition says, having
collected in one volume, after the captivity the psalms of several, or
rather their words-" (Hippolytus, Fragments p199) which Hezekiah also
had earlier edited. (p176)
2 Esdras 14:22-47 says Ezra did this in 40 days and 2
Maccabees 2:13 says Nehemiah "founded a library and collected the books
about the kings and prophets, and the writings of David, and letters of
kings-" but we only need to go back to when it was said that "one jot
or one tittle shall in no wise pass-" (Matt 5:18, Lk 16:17) and that
"all scripture is inspired by God-" (2 Tim 3:16) Esdras or Ezdras is
the Greek form of the name Ezra.
One writer goes as far as to say "The word 'passover' was
inserted deceptively into the narrative by later scribes who wanted to
confuse the issue and justify the later wrong passover on Abib 15 which
many of the later Jews were observing." (Chronology of the Exodus
Passover, p22a) "the Jews are entrusted with the oracles of God," (Rom
3:2) If scribes altered it why didn't they just delete or change the
word herd in verse 2 too to complete the job?
In the instructions for the original Passover it says
"They shall eat the flesh THAT NIGHT,-" (Ex 12:8) and 2 Chron 35 shows
the passover festive offering, was offered at about the same time or
shortly after the passover sacrifice and both were eaten with
unleavened bread from the time the passover was cooked in the afternoon
of the 14th and eaten through the night of the 15th. Some think both
the sacrificing and eating was to be done on the same "Jewish" day like
the Samaritans
who sacrifice their lambs after sunset then bleed and prepare them before
cooking them for three hours and then begin their meal at midnight. (See:
www.the-samaritans.com/the-festival-of-passover) Some claim Jesus and his
disciples ate some Passover lamb sacrificed after sunset in the evening he
was betrayed but Jesus was arrested long before any passover lamb would have had enough time to been
cooked and ready to eat. John
18:24-28 says
the high priests Annas and Caiaphas did not want to become defiled
on the 14th, so they could eat the Passover the following
night which was at
the beginning of the 15th. The
Jews who sacrificed their lambs from about 1:30 in the afternoon took
about the same length of time in preperation the passover meals as the Samaritans do today. They sacrificed and bled the lambs then cooked
them whole in fire as the bible requires from about 1pm to 3pm so they
were ready to eat about 6 hours later, in the evening between about 7pm
to 9pm.
6TH HOUR There
are
several views as to what John 19:14 says, "it was about the SIXTH hour.
He said to the Jews `here is your king'". Some think this was at 12
noon on the day before the Passover, (Myers). Bullinger in
Appendix 156 says it was on the 14th after the supper on "our Tuesday
midnight", or the 6th hour of the night, but Matthew shows that Jesus was not delivered to Pilate
until after "morning came" (Matt 27:1) and the hours of night were
usually referred to as "watches". Some think John used Roman time and
that it means 6am others think it was 9am or 12 noon. John 18:28 says
"it was early". This can't mean that it was "early" in the night as it
was after Jesus and his disciples had the supper, then had gone to the
garden on the Mt of Olives (Lk 22:39), where some fell asleep (v36),
then after having woken his disciples three times (Mark 14:41), and
then having returned to praying, Judas came with a multitude and Peter
cuts off the ear of a servant of the high priest, and Jesus is
arrested. After this Annas sent him bound to Caiaphas the high priest
(John 18:24, Matt 26:57) to the palace of the high priest" (Mark 14:54)
where they held a meeting and where Jesus was interrogated. This appears
to have taken several hours as Luke 22:59 shows that Peter spent at
least about an hour there before the cock crowed. Bullinger 160. Jesus had told Peter "Truly, I say to you, this very
night, before the cock crows, you will deny me three times." (Matt
26:34) "Truly, I say unto you, this very night, before the cock crows
twice, you will deny me three times." (Mark 14:31) "I tell
you,
Peter, the cock will not crow this day, until you three times deny that
you know me." (Lk 22:34) and "Truly, truly, I say to you, the cock will
not crow, till you have denied me three times." (John 13:38) but Mark
14:68 shows that when Peter denied Jesus the first time, the cock
crowed, but this statement has been removed from some late revisionist
translations. The cock probably crowed sometime near dawn,
this
was followed by more abuse (v63-65). After this meeting "as soon as IT WAS DAY the elders of
the people and the chief priests and the scribes came together, and led
him into their council," (v66) after this Jesus was taken to Pontius
Pilate the Governor (Matt 27:1, Mark 15:1, Luke 23:1, John 18:28) so
"it was early" in the morning after all this had happened that "they
themselves went not into the judgment hall, lest they should be
defiled; but that they might eat the passover" (John 18:28)
Purification took seven days. (Acts 21:27)
Solomon Zeitlin points out that there is no law in the
early tannaitic literature before the destruction of the Temple that a
Judaean entering a heathen house was defiled for seven days" (JQR
57-58, p44), Numbers 19:16 says "whoever touches one that is slain with
a sword in the open fields, or a bone of a man, or a grave, shall be
unclean seven days." Ezekiel 44:26 applies the high priests rules to
all priests. Josephus who wrote after the destruction of the
Temple shows that in his day the inhabitants of Tiberius were regarded
as unclean for seven days because the city had been built where previously
there had been graves. (Ant 18:2:3) but there was not any scriptural
"defilement" for entering into such buildings. The priests may have
simply wanted to avoid becoming unclean by coming into contact with the
"unclean" Romans so as to avoid the need for the ritual washings that
would interfere with their work that day and may have resulted in them
becoming ineligible to kill and eat the sacrifices until the second
month, as Numbers 9:9 shows "If any man of you or of your descendants
is unclean through touching a dead body,-" It appears that the Jews
intended eating the Passover lamb in the afternoon of the Passover day
of Nisan 14, or at least killing it to eat that night, (Ex 12:8)
otherwise what John says about them not wanting to risk becoming
defiled is meaningless. If it wasn't the Passover that they
were
planning to eat, why does John 13:1-2 say, "BEFORE the feast of the
passover"- supper being ended".
Matt 27:24 shows Pilate washed his hands between morning
and shortly before Jesus was led away (v32) and this was before the
darkness that began at the sixth hour. (v45) Tatian (AD160) said "it
had reached six hours" when Pilate "said to the Jews, Behold your
king!. (Diatessaron, 51:2, A-N Vol 10, p121)
The so called "Constitutions of the Holy Apostles" says
much the same, "the executioners took the Lord of glory and nailed him
to the cross, crucifying Him indeed at the sixth hour, but having
received the sentence of his condemnation at the third hour." (A-N Vol
7, p445, Book 5, Sect' 3, Ch 14, and p496, Book 8, Sect' 4, Ch 34)
Ignatius to the Trallians (Ch, 9) also says it was "-at the sixth
hour-", but Mark says "it was the third hour" when he was nailed to the
stake (Mark 15:25) and agrees that "when the sixth hour had come, there
was darkness over the whole land until the ninth hour." Luke also
agrees with this. (Luke 23:44) These "hours" were approximations of one
twelfth of a day and the "third hour" would be what we today would say
was between 8am to 9am or in some contexts it would mean around 9am so
also the "sixth hour" would be somewhere from approximately 11am to
12am. As there was darkness from noon some
time after Jesus had been nailed to the stake then the "sixth hour" in
John appears to have been after morning or daybreak and before noon.
The "sixth hour" may have merely been John's estimation of
the time of day, but some early writers made much of certain numbers
that they thought were of particular significance like six. There was
an eclipse of the sun on Saturday 24th of November in AD29 at 11am
which later writers said was "at the sixth hour of the day", this was
in the 202nd Olympiad and was associated with the death of Jesus.
(Chronology of Eclipses and Comets by Justin Schove,
p6-7)
Irenaeus in about AD181 explained some teachings of Marcus
who said "-man was formed on the sixth day; - on the sixth day, which
is the preparation, that the last man appeared for the regeneration of
the first. Of this arrangement, both the beginning and the end were
formed at the SIXTH hour, at which he was nailed to the tree."
(Irenaeus, Against Heresies, A-N Vol 1, p338, 510) Irenaeus seems to
have accepted some of this error. "The Lord, therefore, recapitulating
in Himself this day, underwent His sufferings upon the day preceding
the Sabbath, that is the sixth day of the creation, on which man was
created; thus granting him a second creation by means of his passion,
which is that [creation] out of death. And there are some again, who
relegate the death of Adam to the thousandth year; for since `a day of
the Lord is as a thousand years,' - with respect to this cycle of days,
they died on the day in which they did also eat, that is, the day of
the preparation, which is termed `the pure supper,' that is the sixth
day of the feast, which the Lord also exhibited when He suffered on
that day;" (ibid: Book 4, Ch 23, p551-2)
Hippolytus (AD170-236) also discusses what Marcus taught,
that man was created on the SIXTH day, and that "the dispensation of
suffering took place on the SIXTH day, which is the PREPARATION being
nailed at the SIXTH hour." (Refutation Ch 34, A-N, p91, 95-6 &
Fragments p179) This teaching that Jesus had been nailed at the 6th
hour on a Friday may have originally come from either Simon Magus or
Cerinthus and caused the belief held by some early writers that as a
day could be viewed as being figuratively 1000 years long, then Jesus had come in the year 5,500 which was the 6th hour of the
sixth day which coincided with the 5,500 year chronological figure of
the Septuagint. (Halley's Bible Handbook, Abrahams Date, p32) Genisis
2:2 in the Septuagint says six days, the Massoretic says seven days.
Origen (AD246-8) said that six was "the perfect number" (Comm' A-N, Vol
10, p469) Eusebius of Caesarea on the Paschal Solemnity said, "For the
number six is effective and active; that is why God is said to have
made the universe in six days." (Ea' Cantalamessa p66)
Peter of Alexandria thought that John originally said it
was about 9am, "about the third hour, as the correct books render it,
and the copy itself that was written by the hand of the evangelist,
which, by the divine grace, has been preserved in the most holy church
of Ephesus,-" (Fragments from the writings of Peter, 5:7, A-N Vol 6,
p282-3) The idea that Jesus was "the Lamb of God" is said to have been
responsible for this alteration.
The Mishna says "If the paschal lamb be slaughtered before noon,
it is not valid." (Paul Cotton, From Sabbath to Sunday, 263.1/1,
Appendix p169) and the nailing of Jesus to the stake at 9am in the
minds of some, may have figured as being the time of his "slaughter"
which they altered to the sixth hour or 12 noon.
Jesus died at about 3pm on the Passover day, Matt
27:45-50, Mark 15:33-37, Luke 23:44-46. It is evident from the
following quotes that these writers also accepted that the evening
began before sunset. "when it WAS EVENING there came a rich man" (Matt
27:57) "and when EVENING HAD COME - Joseph of Arimathea - went to
Pilate, and asked for the body of Jesus. (Mark 15:42-3) ["It was the
day of Preparation and the sabbath WAS BEGINNING" when Jesus was put
into the tomb. (Luke 23:54) John 19:14,31,42 confirms that "it was the
day of Preparation, that the bodies (plural) should not remain upon the
stake or post (stauron-singular) on the sabbath day, (for that sabbath
day was a high day.)" when "Nicodemus also" came. (v39) Friday was the
weekly day of preparation for the sabbath (Ex 16:5,22, Ant 16:6:2) but
it is not a term that is exclusively used for each Friday as the 14th
of Nisan was also called the Preparation day, for the yearly feast of
the Passover (Matt 27:62, Mark 15:42, Luke 23:54 and John 19:14,31,42)
which was the same day on which all leaven was to be removed. John clearly says "it was the day of preparation for
the passover" (v42). Ignatius (Trallians, Ch 9) or a later revisionist,
appears to have been the first to associate this preparation day with
Friday, Irenaeus too, who wrote between AD182 to 188 said "It was on
the sixth day, which is the preparation, that the last man appeared for
the regeneration of the first." (Book 1, Ch 14, A-N, Vol 1, p383, p551)
The Gospel of Nicodemus (Ch's 15-16) also suggest this and Clement of
Alexandria wrote about the Gnostics in about AD193 saying, "He knows
also the enigmas of the fasting of those days - I mean the fourth and
the Preparation. For the one has its name from Hermes, and the other
from Aphrodite." (Book 7, Ch 12, A-N Vol 2, p544) and the fictitious
Constitutions of the Apostles says "He commanded us to fast on the
fourth and sixth days of the week; the former on account of his being
betrayed, and the latter on account of his passion." (Book 5, Sect' 3,
Ch 15, A-N Vol 7, p443-7) Peter of Alexandria says Jesus suffered on
the sixth day, the preparation day (Canon 15, A-N Vol 1, p278)
Victorinus Bishop of Petau who died in AD304 said "The
sixth day is called parasceve, that is to say, the preparation of the
kingdom." (A-N Vol 7, p341)
The New Testament writers do not call this preparation day
the sixth day anywhere or say that it was the preparation day for the
weekly sabbath. The 14th of Nisan was called the passover day and was
also called the Preparation day for the Passover, but how could it be
called the Preparation for the Passover if the Passover was killed at
the beginning of the 14th ?
If we follow the idea of killing and eating the passover
at the beginning of the 14th then instead of "the" preparation day
being on the 14th it would need to have been on the 13th which was not
the day prior to the "high day".
The preparations that were made by the disciples on the
13th for the last supper at the start of the 14th were not on "the day
of preparation". John 11:55 and 12:12 shows many people "went up
from
the country to Jerusalem before the Passover, to purify themselves." so
it would make sense that these visitors who arrived at Jerusalem to
keep the Passover some time before the feast would have already removed
the leaven from their homes before they began their journey to
Jerusalem. Also in years when the Passover fell on the weekly sabbath
day, the people would need to have removed the leven before the
14th had arrived.
Josephus shows the Jews prepared for the Passover for
several days before the 14th and the pilgrims to Jerusalem would have
had to remove the leven from their homes before they left on their
journey to the temple. As these people and also the disciples
would not have had any bread to eat between the time they had destroyed
their leven and the beginning of the feast, they may have already
prepared some unleavened bread to eat during this time and so perhaps
called it the first day of unleavened bread but there was no reason
that they could not eat both leavened and unleavened bread at the time
of the Passover supper at the start of Nisan 14, although perhaps it
may be considered in a sense that the days of Unleavened Bread had
already started for them.
The death and even the burial of Jesus was before the sun
had set, so the expression "three days and three nights" appears to
refer to the time Jesus spent in the tomb otherwise the time between
his death and sunset could be seen as involving a fourth day, although
it is evident that the disciples understood the statement by Jesus that
he would be 3 days and 3 nights in the "heart of the earth" (Matt
12:40) to mean the length of time he would be dead rather than the
length of time he spent in the tomb, as the emphasis is on the time of
his resurrection from the dead "on the third day" and "AFTER three days
rise again." (Mark 8:31), otherwise from 3pm until an evening being at
sunset would be the first of four days, so it appears that the period
of evening can begin from at least as early as 3pm, this does not mean
that Jesus did not spend three days and three nights in the tomb as he
was placed in the tomb at about sunset and appears to have remained
there until after sunset on Saturday.
Edersheim says that according to the Talmud, on the
Passover day the "evening" sacrifice was slain at 1.30pm instead of the
usual time of 2.30pm before the Passover was slain. (The Temple by
Alfred Edersheim, p222-3)
COVENANTS The
Scofield
reference bible on p95 lists 8 covenants:- Edenic (Gen 1:28), Adamic
(Gen 3:15), Noahic (Gen 9:1), Abrahamic (Gen 15:18, 17:2), Mosaic (Ex 19:25),
Palestinian (Deut 30:3), Davidic (2 Sam 7:16), New (Heb 8:8). There are
also other covenants that were made as well, a covenant to remove the
inhabitants of Canaan (Ex 34:10), with Phinehas (Nu 25:12-13)
etc.
Coulter claims that the Passover supper is a yearly
renewal of the covenant God made with Abram in Gen 15:6 which was to
give the land to Abrams descendants (and was by
faith
before his circumcision, Rom 4:10, 13) several others also say the
Passover is a renewal of the covenant each year, (Patton, The Journal,
March 1999, p4) but the bible does not say this. Luke 22:19 says "this
is my body." and some add "which is given for you. Do this in
remembrance of me." The passover is not an annual renewal like some
pagans practice but is done "in remembrance" of the death of Jesus. (1
Cor 11:24) It is a symbolic Memorial Supper. God later
confirms
his covenant with Abraham by requiring circumcision. (Gen 22:10)
Abraham is told that this covenant would continue through the
descendants of his son Isaac. (21:12)
In Ch 22 God tests Abraham with Isaac after which
God says
he will bless Abraham and multiply his descendants. (v15-18).
Typically these are:- 1)
Abraham 2)
Isaac 3) Circumcision
Isaac (son)
Passover Pentecost
Paul says that the covenant with Abraham which was
"previously ratified" cannot be annulled by the law that came 430 years
later, (Gal 3:17) "In him also you were circumcised with a circumcision
made without hands, by puting off the body of flesh in the circumcision
of Christ; and you were buried with him in baptism,-" (Col 2:11-12).
"For as many of you as were baptised into Christ have put on Christ. -
And if you are Christ's then are you Abraham's offspring, and heirs
according to the promise. (Gal 3:27-29) "Behold the days are
coming, says the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house
of Israel and the house of Judah," (Jer 31:31)
Observing the memorial supper at the start of Nisan 14 "in
remembrance", and the memorial of deliverance from Egypt on the 15th
at the time of the Exodus and also the memorial of Trumpets are given,
but as a concordance can show, there is no reference for celebrating
Gods covenant with Abraham, his circumcision or the renewal of baptism
on Nisan 14 or anywhere where it says we are to "renew the covenant
each year", but Coulter claims that the covenant of Gen 15 which was
"previously ratified" has to be renewed by observing the supper at the
beginning of Nisan 14 every year. Also the supper is not "holy" and the
evening is not holy, except when it coincides with the weekly sabbath.
The mistaken belief that a covenant that has already been
ratified by God needs to be "renewed" each year appears to have been
adopted from the Book of Jubilees 6:17 where Pentecost was celebrated
to renew the covenant every year.
Paul said in 1Cor 5:7 "For Christ, our paschal lamb, has
been sacrificed." while Coulter says that the death of Christ has
nothing whatever to do with the Passover killed at the temple. (Tape
156, Side 2, about 1/2 way through) but then he later says that the
death of Christ fulfilled and encompassed all the sacrifices given in
the Old Testament, not just the Passover. (Sin, Guilt and the Passover
offerings were symbols of this, but if the "Thank" offerings symbolised
this, then was Jesus sacrificed to give thanks to God ?)
Although the "passing over" of the Israelites homes was at
midnight on the 15th of Nisan, the reason for the "passing over" was
due to the killing of the passover lamb on the 14th and this is
supported by the statement of the chief priests and scribes in Matt
26:5 and Mark 14:2, showing that Jesus who was the true passover, was
killed before the time that the actual feast began, but if the symbolic
passover lamb had been killed in the evening at the beginning of the
14th then why wasn't Jesus who was the true passover also killed in the
evening at the same time of the day instead of at 3pm on the passover
day.
The Exodus from Egypt which happened at night, and the
crossing of the sea three nights later, (Ex 14:24-27) is seen as a
typological event that pictures both the death and resurrection of
Jesus and also the Christian life between baptism and the victory over
death which is represented by the morning offering of the Wavesheaf of
firstfruits. (The Exodus, M.Bennett, p44-7)
If the Passover was killed at the beginning of the 14th
then the time it represents between the death and resurrection would be
4 days and 4 nights.
Jubilees 49:1 says "-on the fourteenth of the first month,
thou shalt kill it before the evening come, and that they shall eat it
during the night, on the evening of the fifteenth, from the time of the
setting of the sun, for this is the first day of the festival and the
first Pascah.". v8 "Let the children of Israel, who will yet come,
observe the Pascah on the day of its time, on the fourteenth of the
first month, between the evenings, in the third part of the day to the
third part of the night; for two parts of the day are given to the
light and the third to the evening; this it is that the Lord has
commanded that thou shalt observe it between the evenings.", so this
practice was well known during the time of Jesus. Josephus said that
the Passover was killed "from the ninth hour to the eleventh" meaning
between 3pm and 5pm. (Wars 6:9:3) It is believed that the Essenes of
the Qumran sect kept the
Passover on a Tuesday evening each year which may or may not have been
in the same week, but the disciples of Jesus began preparing for the
Passover in the upper room when the day for killing the Passover was
approaching, which was not necessarily that night but in the following
afternoon of the same 14th day that was approaching, so it appears that
not only did they keep the supper there at the beginning of the 14th
but also intended or did keep the memorial feast there on the following night, but as they all fled, (Matt 26:56) it is
uncertain that they did. The gospel of Peter says (v7) "we fasted and
sat mourning and weeping night and day until the sabbath." (A-N Vol 10,
p7) Some contend that like the original passover the meal
should only be eaten within their homes as Exodus 12:46 says, "In one
house shall it be eaten;".
When the temple was built the Israelites traveled to
Jerusalem to keep the Passover and Deuteronomy 16:2 says the sacrifice
of the passover was to be kept "-in the place which the Lord shall
choose-". After Jesus died Paul shows that the "Lords Supper" held at
the start of the 14th of Nisan was not observed in their homes but
where they had "come together therefore into one place" (1 Cor 11:20)
which v21 shows was not their own
homes. Some
think that during the wandering in the wilderness that they did not
keep the passover because they say the children were not circumcised,
(Joshua 5:5) for as no uncircumcised male was to eat the passover it
appears true that at least the children and perhaps as the 40 years of
wandering was itself an act of redemption that even under Gods nose the
majority did not keep it, (Deut 12:8, Amos 5:25-6, Acts 7:42-3, Heb
3:7-19), but Joshua and Caleb probably did as Josh 5:2 says the
circumcision was for the "second time".
Tuesday evening (start of Nisan 14) The Last
Supper and betrayal.
Wednesday Nisan 14 The Preparation and Passover
day.
Thursday Nisan 15 First day of the Feast of
Unleavened Bread "a high day".
Friday Nisan 16 The Pharisees Wavesheaf day.
Saturday Nisan 17 The weekly Sabbath and day of
the resurrection.
Sunday Nisan 18 The "Sadducees" Wavesheaf day.
Samaritans and perhaps others sacrifice animals, but as
this is no longer necessary (Heb 10:12-18) whether anyone believes the
Passover was kept at the beginning or end of the 14th of Nisan should
not affect the memorial observed by Christians on "the same night in
which he was betrayed" (1Cor 11:23) Some say this was merely a teaching
night in preperation for the actual memorial the following night. Some who believe that the Passover was killed and eaten at
the beginning of the 14th of Nisan distinguish those who
believe
that it was anciently killed near the end of the 14th and eaten at the
beginning of the 15th, with the misrepresentation that they are
observing the Passover on the 15th, because of when they believe it was
anciently eaten, but Christians do not kill and eat any Passover lambs
and as Ronald Dart points out in a CGI tape, the important aspect of
the Passover day for Christians is the symbolism of the death of the
lamb on Nisan 14 and not when it was eaten, as Numbers 9:13 shows the
emphasis was that they "-offer the Lord's offering at its appointed
time:" so there should be no reason for division among those who
believe differently while practicing the same things.
430 YEARS Gen
15:13-16
says "Then the Lord said to Abram, 'Know of a surety that your
descendants will be sojourners in a land that is not theirs, and they
will be slaves there, and they will be oppressed for four hundred
years; but I will bring judgment on the nation which they serve, and
afterward they shall come out with great possessions. As for yourself,
you shall go to your fathers in peace; you shall be buried in good old
age. And they shall come BACK
HERE in the fourth generation; for the iniquity of the Amorites is not
yet complete.'" The Book of Jubilees says that like the covenant with
Noach (6:15-16) this covenant with Abram was made "in the middle" of
the third month. (14:1-10) which could leave us wondering if the 430
years were counted from when Abraham entered Canaan, or the day the
covenant was made with Abraham which could have been on the evening of
the 15th of Nisan or on Pentecost, or from when Joseph or Jacob went
down to Egypt or from when the enslavement began which according to the
Book of Jashar was "after the death of Levi," (Jash 63:2)
Exodus
1:6 says "And Joseph died, and all his brethren and all that
generation.", before the 400/430 years of enslavement began. Stephen
says in Acts 7:6 "And God spoke to this effect, that his posterity
would be aliens in a land belonging to others, who would enslave them
and ill-treat them four hundred years." Exodus 12:40-41 says "The time
the people of Israel dwelt
IN EGYPT was four hundred and thirty years. And at the end of four
hundred and thirty years, on that very day, all the hosts of the Lord
went out from the land of Egypt." Exod 12 only says they "dwelt" in
Egypt, but Gen 15 says
"oppressed" and Stephen says "enslave" and "ill-treat" them four
hundred years, which would mean they only had 30 years of freedom in
Egypt before they were enslaved, but the chronology shows it was much
more than 30 years before any enslavement. Also Abraham, Isaac and
Jacob were not "the people of Israel" and Joseph was not
"enslaved" while he was viceroy of Egypt and so should not be
considered to be included among those to have been enslaved during the
430 years mentioned in Ex 12:40. The events recorded in 1 Chron 7:20-24
show that at least some of the Israelites were not even in Egypt during
the "430 years" but were in Gath (a Philistine city) Beth Horon
(between Jaffa and Jerusalem) and Uzzen-sheerah, that is believed to be near Beth Horon.
(v24) Jubilees Ch 46 says some lived "in the mountains of
Hebron". We are also faced with Paul in Gal 3:16-17 saying "This is
what I mean: the law, which came four hundred and thirty years
afterward, (after Gods covenant with Abraham) does not annul a covenant
previously ratified by God, so as to make the promise void." This
appears to make the entire time from the covenant with Abraham until
Sinai to have only been 430 years, and so Paul contradicts Stephen.
There are differing opinions about this chronology. The Book of
Jubilees apparently makes the time from the
birth of Isaac in 1980 AM to the Exodus in 2410 AM to have been 430
years. (HUCA, Vol 35 p50) while the Sedar Olam written in about AD160,
gives the time between the birth of Isaac until the Exodus to have been
400 years. Josephus said, "-our fathers--were fallen under the power of foreign kings for four hundred years together,- (Wars, 3:8:4 ) "They left Egypt in the month Xanthicus on the
fifteenth by lunar reckoning, 430 years after the coming of our
forefather Abraham to Canaan, Jacob's migration to Egypt having taken
place 215 years later." (Ant 2:15:2 or 318) Josephus seems to have
never reconciled whether the Israelites were enslaved for 430 years
(Ant 2:9:1) or only half that period (Ant 2:15:2) Pseudo-Jonathan
"explains
that the 430-years count began when God spoke to Abraham during the
vision narrated in Gen 15." (Note in Targum Onkelos p129) this was also
the view of Origen (cAD185-254) who says the Exodus was 430 years
"after
the covenant made by God with Abraham." (Commentary on John, Book 10,
Ch 23, A-N Vol 10 p404) "Demetrius' chronology for the stay in Egypt is
more
complex; Levi was 43 years old when Jacob and his sons entered Egypt,
17 years later Qehath was born; Qehath begat Amram at the age of 40;
Amram, Moses, at the age of 78; Moses' age during the Exodus was 80,
making a total of 215. There is little doubt that Demetrius had a
preconceived total into which he fits his dates." (HUCA Vol 35, 1964,
p51) Also Gen 46:11 shows Qehath (Kohath) was born before Jacob and
Levi went down to Egypt. Hippolytus says Kohath was aged 4. (Ch 27) "Rabbinic tradition maintained that the stay in Egypt
lasted 210 years. This was based on the assumption that Abram's first
entrance into Canaan was at the age of 70. Hence, Abram stayed there 30
years; Isaac, 60; Jacob, 130, making a total of 220 years in Canaan,
remaining 210 years for the stay in Egypt, for the grand total must be
430-" (Wacholder, HUCA Vol 35, p51)
Jasher 81:3-4 also says that the sojourning in Egypt was 210 years.
Rashi said that "-only if you reckon the 400 years from
the birth of Isaac will you find that from the time they came into
Egypt until the time they left it was 210 years-" he also thought that
the 430 years could only be counted from when Isaac the "offspring" of
Abraham had been born. (Commentary on Exodus, p61) but how could they
be enslaved in Egypt for 400 years and come out after 430 years if they
were only in Egypt for 210 or 215 years?
The Mekhilta of Ishmael says "said the Holy One, blessed
be He, if they carry out repentance, I shall redeem them counting by
generations, and if not, I shall redeem them counting by years."
(Mekhilta, Neusner Vol 1, p83) but from Isaac to Moses is at least 5
generations and only the three generations of Kohath, Amram and Moses
would have been
enslaved, not four generations as Gen 15:16 says, and after they had
come out of Egypt, Moses' generation died in the Wilderness before
the following generation entering the promised land.
Adding the traditional figure of 210 years in Egypt, to
the 190 years from the birth of Isaac until Jacobs entry into Egypt,
adds up to only 400 years and again contradicts the statement that they
spent 430 years in Egypt.
Event
|
Age of Abraham
|
Age of Isaac
|
Age of Jacob
|
Age of Joseph
|
Reference
|
Birth of Ishmael
|
86 years
|
|
|
|
|
Covenant with Abraham
|
99 years
|
|
|
|
Gen 17:24
|
Birth of Isaac
|
100 years
|
0
|
|
|
|
Isaac weaned
|
103 years
|
3
|
|
|
|
Isaac marries Rebekah
|
140 years
|
40
|
|
|
Gen 25:20
|
Esau and Jacob born
|
160 years
|
60
|
0
|
|
|
Abraham dies
|
175 years
|
75
|
15
|
|
Gen 25:7
|
Joseph born
|
(266 )
|
|
91
|
0
|
|
Jacob dies
|
(322 )
|
|
147
|
56
|
Gen 47:28
|
Joseph dies
|
(376 )
|
|
|
110
|
Gen 50:26
|
The figures in Genesis show that Joseph died 277 years after the covenant with Abraham with
no mention of the Israelites having yet become slaves in Egypt. This leaves only 153 years
until the covenant at Sinai meaning the “enslavement” would have been even less than this 153 years that remained and so contradicts Ex
12:40-42 that tells us it was 430 years.
Ethelbert Bullinger in Selected Writings (p11-12)
concludes that the 430 years of sojourning started in Ur from "the call
of Abraham" when he was 70, that he was 75 when he departed from Haran
and that the 400 years of "strangership, servitude and affliction"
began "from the birth of Isaac" and includes the time in Canaan, (Ex
6:4). He explains the sojourning of Abrahams "seed" that were "in his
loins" was 430 years and that the words "who dwelt in Egypt" "form a
relative clause defining who the people were," but Gen 15:13 says they
were "oppressed for four hundred years" and Stephen says (Acts 7:6)
they were
"- in bondage and entreat them evil four hundred years". Exodus 12:40
says "Now the sojourning of the CHILDREN OF ISRAEL who dwelt in Egypt ,
was four hundred and thirty years," Abraham was not one of "the
children of Israel". Bullinger also has a note on Exodus 15:13 calling
it an "introversion" where he tries to explain the contradiction by adding parenthesis to change the meaning of the verse and seperate what he says was 215 years of enslavement from 400 years of sojourning "thy seed shall be a stranger in a land that is not theirs, (and shall
serve them; and they shall afflict them) four hundred years"
Floyd Jones in "Chronology of the Old Testament" follows the same
reasoning and thinks we should make
a distinction between the length of time spent "sojourning" (430 years)
the time of affliction" (400 years)
and the length of time "dwelling" in Egypt (215 years) and he says that
the actual enslavement lasted for less than 144 years as well as saying
it was for less than 128 years to as low as 80 years while on page 59
he says the "dwelling, servitude and affliction in Egypt" was for 215
years. On page 55 he substitutes
the term "Jews" who were the descendants of Judah both for "Abraham"
and for "the
children of Israel" and does little to explain how the "fourth
generation" fits into his scheme.The Seventh-Day Adventist Bible Commentary supposing a
period of 215 years between Jacob going into Egypt and the time of the
Exodus makes the 400 years of affliction begin when Abraham "was 105
and his son Isaac 5 years old (Ch. 21:5) This would be about the time
Ishmael who "was born after the flesh persecuted him [Isaac] that was
born after the Spirit" (Gal 4:29; Gen 21:9-11) this considers Canaan
was part of Egypt. (Vol 1, Genesis, p314-5, 220.7/SEV) but if Canaan
was part of Egypt then they didn't come "out" at the Exodus and as
Matthew Sturgis says, "They would merely have passed from one Egyptian
controlled land to another." (It Ain't Necessarily So, p54, 221.9STU)
Gen 15:16-18 says "they shall come HERE again in the
fourth generation;" -"- from the river of Egypt unto the great river,
the river Euphrates:" Colin Heath thinks the 400 years began from God,s
"oath to
Isaac" (1 Chron 16:16, Ps 105:9) when Isaac was 30 years of age.
(www.bibleinsight.com) Michael Bennett thinks that the 430 years began from when
Abram left Haran at 75 years of age and that the 400 years began 30
years later when Isaac was weaned at 5 years of age (Gen 21), and that
just as at Kadesh, God "backdated" the 40 years wandering by over a
year, to begin from the "disbelief at Marah, just three days after the
Red Sea crossing.", so he thinks the counting of the 430 years were
"backdated" because the children of Israel were in Abrams loins (Heb
7:9-10), (The Exodus, p12-14). He wants the 430 years "in Egypt" to
begin from when Abram left Haran and the 400 years enslavement to begin
when Isaac was 5 years old, but then wants the first of the four
generations "in Egypt" to begin with the sons of Jacob 215 years later.
But if the 430 years began from Abram leaving Haran then the Israelites
did not come out of Egypt in "the fourth generation" but several
generations later. He says the only person of the fourth generation who
entered the Promised Land was Caleb. (Nu 14, Deut 1) In the WCG "Answers to questions from Genesis" they say
"it is evident that the 430 years began when Abraham was ninety-nine
years old and ended the year the exodus of his descendants out of Egypt
and their appearance at Sinai.", but this ignores the statement that it
would be in the "fourth" generation as there was at least six
generations between Isaac to Moses. It is also argued that the 400 year
period was referring to Abrahams "seed" and so did not necessarily fall
within the 430 year time frame but began with Abrahams death 76 years
later and ended 6 years after they entered Canaan, but the period
before Joseph was taken to Egypt or until the time Jacob arrived there,
and the time after the Exodus were not years spent "in Egypt" and the
400 years of enslavement were predicted to be spent "in a land
belonging to others" which Ex 12:40 shows was while they were IN EGYPT,
and was not referring to any time before or after and so should only be
counted from when some actual "enslavement" of Abrahams descendants
began. Henk Jens suggesed, "the 400 years for Abrahams "Seed" start
from Abrahams death, which is 76 years later after the promise.
Abraham's seed, starting with Isaac had 430 - 76 = 354 years to the
giving of the Law and so the period Abraham's seed were without their
land, comprises those 354 years, the 40 years wandering and the 6 years
of Conquest; a total of 354+40+6= 400 years." but again years "without
their land" were not the same as years "in Egypt", and Ex 12:40-41 says
after 430 years they came "- OUT from the land of EGYPT." The
Samaritan text of Ex 12:40 which may have been written
around 400BC says "Now the sojourn of the children of Israel and their
fathers, which they dwelt in the land of Canaan and in the land of
Egypt was 430 years." The Septuagint version that was written about 300BC
says, "Now the sojourning of the Israelites which they and their fathers
had sojourned in the land of Egypt AND IN THE LAND OF CANAAN was four
hundred and thirty years." (Some have 435 years.) A
note in Rashi says
the addition is; "AND IN OTHER LANDS". (Appendix, p238) The
Mekhilta of Ishmael and Megillot 9a say this was an alteration made by
the 72 translators at the time of King Ptolemy, so this question
appears to have a long history and there is uncertainty as to
whether this was an addition to the text or if it was dropped from the
Hebrew text, but as Abraham Isaac and Jacob were not slaves in Canaan
their inclusion in the figure of 400 years contradicts that they were
not slaves and then also how could it be said the Israelites had come
out of Canaan and Egypt when they were now going into Canaan, via the
Wilderness, which was neither the slavery of Egypt nor the promised
land of Canaan, for they had left one but had not entered the other.
[This symbolic 40 years of Gods guidance between
"Heaven and Hell" is reflected in the Days of Unleavened Bread, the
Feast of Tabernacles and the life of Christians who have
symbolically left Egypt (sin) but have not yet arrived at the Promised
land.]
A
note in the Targum of Onkelos thinks the words were an
addition
and "may have been prompted by the apparent mathematical impossibility
of the period." "Kohath was born before Jacob left for Egypt (Gen
46:11) and lived 133 years. His son Amram, the father of Moses, lived
137 years, and Moses himself was 80 years old at the Exodus. So at most
the period could be a little more than 300 years. Further, Moses mother
was Levi's daughter (Ex 2:1 and 6:20)." Cf Gerhard Larsson, "The
Chronology of the Pentateuch: A Comparison of the MT and LXX", JBL 102,
no 3 (1983); 401-9. (Targum Onkelos to Exodus, p129, Drazin, KTAV)
Rashi had said much the same as this in his Commentary on
Exodus. (p61) If 210 years in Egypt was correct then this
would
mean that the enslavement began five years after Jacob arrived in Egypt
or if Exodus 12 means 400 years enslavement and they were in Egypt for
430 years then they only had 30 years of freedom, but as Rashi points
out, Jacob entered Egypt when he was 130 years old, (Gen 47:9) and died
17 years later when he was 147 years old (Gen 47:28)
Joseph was born
when Jacob was 91 years old, (Gen 30:24-5, 31:38, 41)
[Joseph was born at the start of the last
six years that Jacob served Laban for his cattle, Gen 31:41 He was
30 when he stood before Pharoah (Gen 41:46) then spent the 7 good years and 2 of
the famine years working for Pharoah before Jacob and his family came
down to Egypt at 130 years of age (Gen 45:5)]
Joseph lived to 110 (Gen
50:22,26) and so was 56 when Jacob died, Joseph then lived for another
54 years which was 71 years after Jacob arrived in Egypt and the
enslavement began sometime after this, so if Josephus was right and the
430 years begin from when Abraham came to Canaan then the enslavement
lasted for less than 144 years and if Paul was right and the Law came
430 years after God made his covenant with Abraham then as Abraham was
75 years old when he departed from Haran (Gen 12:4) and the covenant
was made up to 10 years after his arrival (Gen 16:3) this may have
reduced this maximum of 144 years enslavement
and so contradicts the statement that they would be "oppressed" 400
years. In an effort to smooth over the contradictions Aryeh Kaplan, a
torah translator says in his introduction to "The Living Torah" that
the Torah uses "idiomatic language" and that it would be a mistake to
translate it literally. His translation of Exodus 12:40-42 says, "The
lifestyle that the Israelites endured in Egypt had thus lasted 430
years. At the end of the 430 years, all of God's armies left Egypt in
broad daylight. There was a night of vigil for God, (preparing) to
bring them out of Egypt. This night remains for the Israelites a vigil
to God for all generations." If it was their "lifestyle" that ended
after 430 years then how did their "lifestyle" change during the harsh conditions of the following
40 years in the wilderness that resulted in the death of their leaders
Moses and Aaron and only two of those who were in Egypt, Joshua and Caleb, entering the "promised land". The difficult
"lifestyle" of the Israelites in history continued as they then went through
many wars and defeats under the Judges and Kings with the
northern tribes being taken captive by the Assyrians in
721BC, Judah being conquered by the Babylonians in 587-6 BC,
conquered by Antiochus 4 in 167 BC, conquered by Herod the Great in 37BC and again by the Romans in AD70. Their "lifestyle" of hardship, being persecued and going into captivity continued under the Nazi's. No! Their "lifestyle" of "servitude" didn't end after 430 years.
FITTING EVENTS INTO 430
YEARS BETWEEN THE COVENANTS Abraham
was 75 when he departed from Haran (Gen 12:4) He arrived in
Canaan and went to Sichem (v6) moved near Bethel (v8) went to Egypt
(v10) then back to Bethel (13:3) and dwelt in the plain of Mamre in
Hebron (Gen 13:18, 14:13) "After these things" (15:1) God makes a
covenant with Abram. (God made two covenants with Abraham. One before
the birth of Ishmael, Gen 15:18, and one before the birth of Isaac,
when Abraham was 99 years old. Gen 17:2, 24) The actual year that
the first covenant was
made
is not mentioned but it seems to infer that he was 85 years old at the
time but it may have been earlier. "after Abraham had dwelt ten years
in the land of Canaan - Hagar - conceived (Gen
16:3-4) (Meaning 10 years since he had departed from Haran)
Nine
months later Abram was 86 years old when Hagar bare Ishmael to Abram.
(Gen 16:16) Paul shows he refers to the covenant made when Abraham "was about an hundred years old" (Rom 4:19) but taking both into consideration we have:
000 The covenant with Abraham. (Abram is 85 years old)
014 Confirmation of the covenant. (Abraham is 99 years old)
015 Birth of Isaac (Abraham is 100 years old)
075 Jacob born to Isaac (Isaac is 60 years old, Gen 25:26)
c161 Levi born to Jacob (when Jacob is 86 years old approximately)
c201 Kohath born to Levi (Levi is 40 years old) Before Jacob is 130 years old.
c275 Amram born to Kohath (75 years old. (Approximation, half way
between)
350 Moses born to Amram (75 years old, (Approximation, half
way between)
430 Covenant at Sinai (Moses is 80 years old)
Another thing that does not add up is that Israel is said
to have increased abundantly while in Egypt (Ex 1:7) but the
approximate ages of Kohath and Amram who are recorded as being in Egypt
at the time would average out at 75 years of age before fathering their child,
which appears to be noticibly old.
THE YEARS BETWEEN
JACOB ENTERING EGYPT AND THE EXODUS Levi
was born to Leah when Jacob was 86y. (Hipp 10:26)
YEARS
IN Joseph was born when Jacob was 91y.
(Gen 30:24-5, 31:38)
EGYPT Kohath was born before Jacob entered Egypt. (Gen 46:11)
4y (Hipp' Ch27)
0000 Jacob 130y, goes to Egypt in the second year
of "Famine", (Gen 45:6-9)
0017 Jacob dies 147y old (Gen 47:28)
Joseph is 56y, Levi 61y, Kohath 17y+.
0071 Joseph dies 110y. (Gen 50:22, 26) Levi is
115y, Kohath is 71y+.
0093 Levi dies 137y. (Exod 6:16, 12P p17)
? Amram born [16y after exile
began. DSS Visions of Amram]
0133 Kohath dies 133y. (Exod 6:18) at the latest.
0134 Latest that Amram could be born to Kohath.
0244 [Aaron born to Amram 110y DSS]
0271 Amram dies 137y, (Ex 6:20)
0272 The latest that Moses could be born to Amram.
0352 The Exodus, Moses is 80y (Ex 7:7)
Using the most extreme and unlikely lengths of time
between Jacob entering Egypt and the time of the Exodus there were 352
years and this would not have allowed any years of freedom before the
enslavement began. "It would still be short 80 years for the number of
430." (HUCA, 35, p51) The 400 years enslavement would also
have
begun at least 9 years before Joseph was born and would have been at
least 48 years before Jacob entered Egypt while Exodus 1:6-11 shows the
enslavement began after Joseph died.
If Kohath and Amram had their sons at about 60 years of
age rather than the year following their death it would result in a
more likely figure of about 200 years in Egypt or even at 110 years of
age as the Dead Sea Scrolls say it would be about 300 years, rather
than the 352 years calculated above.
The Bible Cyclopaedia by A Fausset p248 says "the register
of Levi in Ex 6:16-20 gives only two links between Levi and Moses, viz.
Kohath and Amram; which has been made an argument for Israel's sojourn
in Egypt only half the 430 years specified (Ex 12:40) But the
Kohathites (Num 3:27) in Moses' time were divided into four families,
Amramites, Jehezarites, Hebronites, and Ussielites, 8600 men and boys
independent of women; and fourth would be Amramites. Now Moses had only
two sons; therefore if Amram his father were the Amram Kohaths father,
(I think he meant to say "Kohath's son") MOSES MUST HAVE HAD
2147 BROTHERS AND BROTHERS' SONS, which is impossible; therefore
between the two Amrams a number of generations must have dropped out."
If this is so then the number of generations that were enslaved in
Egypt exceeded the four that God told Abraham. The Encyclopedia of
Bible Difficulties repeats this idea. "It is quite obvious that if by
Moses' time (according to Num.3:27-28) the combined total of Amramites,
Izharites, Hebronites, and Uzzielites came to 8,600 -all of whom were
descended from Kohath- the Amram who had perhaps one-fourth of 8,600
"children" (or 2,150) could not have been the immediate parent of
Moses-" (p111), so how did the families of Gershon become 7500 and
Merari reach 6200 in only three generations, and how did "All the
offspring of Jacob were seventy persons" (Ex 1:5) become the 603,550
men excluding the Levites of Ex 38:26 and Nu 2:32 ? (After 40 years in
the wilderness there were only 601,730. Nu 26:51) "It has been pointed
out that if the same ratio of increase were maintained as existed in
Jacob's own family, that is, that every one of Jacob's
grandsons,
great-grandsons, etc, begat 12 sons, the fourth generation would have
consisted of far more than 600,000 men." (SDA Vol 1, p556) Were there
four women for every Israelite man in Egypt, and did each man produced
such a large family? The Arab population grew from 800,000 in 1948 to 5
million by AD2000 but some Armenian immigrants claim they are
Palestinians. The Egyptologist, Flinders Petrie thought the word
"eleph" meant "family" rather than "thousand", Gunther Plaut comments
that in Hebrew "600 alef" did not mean
"thousands" but that "alef" meant "contingents", groups, families or
"clans". (Torah Commentary, p463)
This would make much more sense by reducing the figures but the
Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties doubts this as the lapim "famulies"
are then followed by hundreds then decades and then digits in
descending order. Halley appears inconsistent as to whether the
Israelites
were in Egypt for 215 or 430 years (p33) but agrees saying "For 70
persons to reach this number in 430 years it would be necessary to
double about every 25 years," (p109)
Foote thinking it was 215 years says, "If they had doubled
every 25 years, they would have been fewer than 20,000. As the
firstborn-males only numbered 22,273 (Numbers 3:40-43) it has been
calculated that the mothers must have had on an average about sixty-six
children apiece!" (The Bible Handbook, p48)
It appears unlikely that such rapid multiplication occurred
as Moses only had two sons and the Israelites only maintained their
numbers over the forty years and this would be difficult to reconcile
with the statement of Numbers 26:59 "The name of Amram's wife was
Jochebed the daughter of Levi, who was born to Levi in Egypt;" and Ex
2:1, 6:20 that "Amram took to wife Jochebed his fathers sister and she
bore him Aaron and Moses,". Kohath lived for 133 years so his sister
Jochebed may have lived a bit longer, but as Moses was 80 at the
Exodus, (Ex 7:7) the time in Egypt appears to have been less than 200
years. The ages of the 4 generations from Levi to Moses have
been
shown to amount to less than 350 years but the 10 generations through
Ephraim could add up to only 210 years if each son reproduced at
approximately 20 years of age, but 430 years or more at 43 years of
age, so the number of years remains unknown.
In the Commentary by Ellicott (Vol 1, p192) they suggest
that because only the two females Dinah, (Gen 46:15) and Serah (v17)
are
mentioned among the 70 (Gen 46:27) who came into Egypt that
the
list only refers to the males but if the females were also
included there may have been a total of about 130.
Fausset follows this idea too in the Bible Cyclopaedia
under Chronology on p129 it says, "There were at the eisodus 51 pairs
at least bearing children, for there were 67 men, viz. Jacobs 12 sons,
51 grandsons, and 4 great grandsons, besides one daughter and one
granddaughter (Gen 46:8-27). These 51 must have taken foreign wives.
then besides, polygamy prevailed. All these causes together fully
account for the great increase in 215 years."
Another view that is offered is that the 430 years in Gal 3:17 were not
from the time of the covenant with Abraham but were from the time when
the covenant was "confirmed" to Jacob (Israel) in Gen 46:2-4 and so it
was about 200 years from the covenant with Abraham plus another 430
years of enslavement until the covenant at Sinai but as Amram, the
father of Moses married the daughter of Levi then there was only three
generations "enslaved" in Egypt and she must have been over 200 years
of age when she bore Moses.
Some attempt to use the genealogical tables of Matthew and Luke, which
are regarded as the descendants of Judah as a substitute for the
Levitical descendants from Levi to Moses.
CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE OF
LEVI
Abraham
Isaac
Jacob
Levi
Gershon 7500 Kohath Merari 6200
Uzziel Amram Izhar
Hebron 8600 (1 Chron
6:1,18,38, 23:12)
Miriam Moses and Aaron
TOTAL = 22,000
Gershom and his brother Eliezer (Ex 18:3-4, 1 Chr 23:15)
Shebuel (1 Chron 23:16) Rehabiah + (1 Chron 23:17)
Jehdeiah (1 Chr 24:20)? Jeshaiah (1 Chron 26:25)
Joram
Zichri
Shelomoth (in Davids time)
Jahath (1 Chron 24:22) ?
COMPARISON OF GENERATIONS BETWEEN
JACOB TO THE TIME OF THE EXODUS
EXODUS
6
NU27/JOS17 1 CHR 7 NUMB
26 1 CHR
2 1 CHR 2
Levi
Joseph
Joseph -
Judah Judah
Kohath
Manasseh
Ephraim
Ephraim
Perez Perez
Amram
Machir
Beriah -
Hezron Hezron
Moses
Gilead
Rephah -
Caleb Ram
-
Hepher
Resheph -
Hur
Amminadab
-
Zelophehad
Telah
-
Uri
Nahshon
(Nu 1:7,
(5 Girls)
Tahan
Tahan
Bezalel 2:3, 7:12-17,
Ladan
10:14, Ruth 4:20)
Ammihud
Elishama
Nun
Joshua
THE
CHRONOLOGICAL TABLES IN MATHEW, LUKE AND RUTH BETWEEN ABRAHAM TO DAVID
Showing a similar consistency in the
number of generations to David.
MATTHEW 1:2-6 LUKE
3:31-34
Abraham
Abraham
Isaac
Isaac
Jacob
Jacob
Judah
Juda
RUTH 4
Perez
Perez
Perez
Hezron
Hezron
Hezron
Ram
-
Ram
Amminadab
Amminadab Amminadab
Nahshon
Nahshon
Nahshon
Salmon
Sala
Salmon
Boaz
Boaz
Boaz
Obed
Obed
Obed
Jesse
Jesse
Jesse
David
David
David
AMRAM AND JOCHEBED
0000 Levi
lived 137
years Jochebed born
before he died 0107
0133 Kohath
lived 133
years Did she outlive her
brother 0240
0270 Amram
lived 137
years Did she marry when aged
377
0377
0350 Moses
at Exodus
80
years
0417
Even using these extremes this only adds up to 417
years in Egypt.
Exodus 1:7 says "the descendants of Israel were
fruitful and increased greatly; they multiplied and grew exceedingly
strong; so that the land was filled with them.".
If we dismiss all the later writers and take the view that
Gen 15:13-16 gives, that the enslavement was to last 400 years and so
each generation was to be approximately 100 years long (or 120 as Gen
6:3 suggests) rather the measured by any particular family line which
could have varied the number of generations within 400 years by whether
they had either an early or late marriage, then admit the probability
that the population increase would have taken more than the actual 4
generations from Jacob that are listed in the biblical account and that
some have been "dropped out", which may explain why the time of Amrams
birth and death is not given relative to his genealogy, we could then
accept that the time of enslavement was in fact 430 years and that the
time from Abram entering Canaan until Jacob entering Egypt of 215 years
was co-incidentally half 430, and we could say that Paul used either
430 years as a rough minimum span of time, or incomplete explanation
of the duration between the covenant with Abraham at Moriah and the
covenant with Israel at Sinai which would have been about 215 + 71 +
400 = at least 686 years.
Theophilus who became bishop of Antioch in AD168, about
100 years after the apostles were there, says in the chronology he
wrote for his friend Autolycus that from the birth of "Isaac, Abraham's
son, to the time when the people dwelt with Moses in the desert, 660
years." (Book 3, Ch 28, A-N Vol 2, p120.)
Abraham entered Canaan when he was 75 years old. (Gen
12:4-5) and was about 100 years old when Isaac was born. (Gen 17:17) so
adding this extra 25 years to the 660 years, gives a total of 685 years
between when Abraham entered Canaan until the Exodus. (215 + 70 + 400 =
685) This 70 years of freedom almost fits the chronological figure of
71 years but having only 30 years of freedom in Egypt (430 - 400 = 30)
remains a contradiction to this figure.
Hippolytus of Rome appears to have thought much the same
saying "the entire period during which Abraham sojourned, and the
entire family descended from him by Isaac, in the country then called
Canaanitis, was 215 years." (Refutation 10:26, A-N Vol 5, p149) and
says "-four hundred and thirty years in Egypt,-" (Against the Jews, 6,
A-N Vol 5, p220) This total is 645 years.
"Demetrius computed that the number given in Exod. 12:40,
430, is to be divided into two equal parts, 215 years from Abram's
arrival to Canaan until Jacob's descent into Egypt and 215
years
to the Exodus." (HUCA Vol 35, p51) but it appears that Demetrius
overlooked Gen 46:11 that says that Qehath (Kohath) was born before
Jacob entered Egypt.
Ibn Ezra (AD1089-1164) "begins the reckoning with the
departure of Abraham from Haran for Canaan. And in fact, exactly two
hundred and fifteen years elapsed between that event and Jacob's
migration to Egypt, yielding the same time span for the stay of the
Israelites in Egypt. This type of symmetry follows a pattern well
established in the patriarchal narratives and elsewhere in the Book of
Genesis. Thus, Abraham lived seventy-five years in the home of his
father and seventy five years in the lifetime of his son Isaac. He was
one hundred years of age at the birth of Isaac, and he lived one
hundred years in Canaan. Jacob lived seventeen years with Joseph in
Canaan and a like period with him in Egypt. Ten generation separated
Noah from Adam, and another ten generations, Abraham from Noah. In the
light of these facts it may be that the neatly balanced periods of time
are intended to be rhetorical rather than literal;-" (JPS Torah
Commentary, Exodus, p63)
Another way to consider these figures is by trying to slot the events
into historical dates. Many follow James Ussher's chronology who came
up with the birth of Abraham to have been in 1996BC and the Exodus
in 1491BC. In the book called "Wars of Gods and Men" by Zecharia
Sitchin he says Abraham was born in 2123BC, the Exodus in 1433BC and the books chronology gives some of
the other years when historical events are thought to have occured or
can be
calculated:
2193 BC Terah born in Nippur (Father of Abram)
2123 BC Abram born in Nippur when Terah is 70 years old.
2096 BC Ur-Nammu dies. Terah and family move to Ur (Abram is 27 years old)
2068 BC Abraham at 55 years of age and family move to Haran
2048 BC Abraham leaves Haran and moves to Canaan aged 75 years old
2047 BC Abraham moves to Egypt (for 5 years)
2037 BC Birth of Ishmael (Abram is 86 years old)
2024 BC Destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah
2024 BC Abraham at 99 years of age begets Isaac (Covenant confirmed)
2023 BC Birth of Isaac (Abraham is 100 years old)
1963 BC Birth of Esau and Jacob (Isaac is 60)
1948 BC Abraham dies 175 years old
1886 BC Isaac (137 years old) blesses Jacob aged 77 who goes to Padan Aram
1872 BC Birth of Joseph (Jacob is 91 years old)
1866 BC Jacob returns home aged 97 years old
1863 BC 430 years before the Exodus (Jacob is 100 years old. Joseph is 9 years old)
1855 BC Joseph sold into Egypt at 17 years of age (Gen 37)
1843 BC Isaac dies 180 years old (Gen 35:28 ) Esau and Jacob are 120 years old
1833 BC Jacob 130 years old moves with family to Egypt (Start of 400 years)
1816 BC Jacob dies 147 years old
1762 BC Joseph dies 110 years old
1513 BC Birth of Moses
1433 BC The Exodus and covenant at Sinai
1393 BC End of Wilderness journey. Moses dies.
This would mean that what Paul says in Galatians 3:16-17 is wrong and
the time between the covenants was 591 years. Sitchin says the
400 years began when Jacob and his family arrived in Egypt and the
430 years began 30 years earlier when Joseph arrived in Egypt but the
chronology shows Joseph did not arrive 30 years before Jacob and his
family arrived in Egypt but only 22 years earlier. From the bible account we might have got the
impression that when Isaac called Esau to bless him that
Isaac was near death and died soon afterwards, but as Esau and Jacob were the same age and
Jacob was 77 years old at the time he
fled to Padan Aram for 20 years (Gen 29) after cheating Esau out of his
blessing and as Isaac lived until he was 180 years of age, (Gen 35:28) the chronology shows that
Isaac lived for another 43 years until Esau and Jacob were 120 years
old. We are not told when in a year events occured so there could be
some accumulated variation from the actual year.
HYKSOS Josephus
thought
that the time when Joseph ruled in Egypt was the period of the Hyksos
or "Shepherd Kings" under Salitis. They are thought to be the Hapiru or
"Outsiders" called Apiru by the Egyptians and that they came from the
north of Palestine and first arrived in Egypt about 1800BC. Some
have thought these were the Hebrews and others thought they were their
"kin". Some suggest that there was not just one exodus but a number of
migrations from Egypt over several centuries. (BAR, Jan/Feb 1998, "Let My People Go and Go and Go and Go")
Abraham is thought to have lived at the same time as King
Hammurabi, 1945-1902BC. (Hertz, p403) although other opinions vary
between about 2300BC to 1700BC. The New Ency' of Archaeological
Excavations in the Holy Land gives the time of the Hyksos of the 15th
dynasty as c1670-1570BC and the rule of Salitis or Sheshi as
1670-1650BC. (p1530)
Halley says the Hyksos were 11 kings of the 15th and 16th dynasties.
(p111)
The Britannica 15th edition says the Hyksos were the 15th
to 17th Dynasties who seized power in 1630BC and ruled Egypt for 108
years until 1521BC. From 1521BC until 40 years before the fall of
Jericho in perhaps 1410BC would also give them less than 200 years of
slavery in Egypt.
Some who believe in a time of 430 years in Egypt think
Joseph lived during the time of Sesostris II of the 12th Dynasty and
that the accepted Egyptian chronology should be shortened by about 300
years so that "the end of the 12th Dynasty of Egypt should be dated to
the 15th century BC which would be about the time of the Biblical
Exodus." (Diggings, Dec 1999 p3-4)
David Rohl suggests a revision of almost 350 years. (Sturgis, p49)
The Twelfth Dynasty in Egypt is estimated to have existed
from about 1991BC to 1786BC and Sesostris II is thought to have ruled
for 19 years between 1897BC to 1879BC. (Calendars of Ancient Egypt,
Parker, p69).
RAAMSES The
name Rameses is
mentioned in 4 places, Gen 47:11, Ex 12:37, Nu 33:3,5. The spelling
Raamses is mentioned in Ex 1:11 and means "son of the sun." so the name
appears to have existed before the time of Josephs arrival in
Egypt. "Raamses in the Masoretic Bible text; Ramesses in the
Septuagint." (Oxford) The store cities built by the Israelites during
their enslavement were named "Peitho, and Rameses, and On, which is
Heliopolis." (Ch 20) The location of Pithom is uncertain. (Millard,
Discoveries p77, also Halley, p852)
Konemann says that it was "Ramesses II, who gave it his
name, Pi-Ramesse -close to present-day Qantir. The town extended over
several square kilometers as far as Tell ed-Dab'a, where the earlier
Hyksos capital Avaris has also been uncovered." (Egypt - the world of
the Pharaohs p207)
Isserlin says "-Raamses (now identified with Tel el
Dab'ah/Qantir) may bean anachronism, and the building operations
envisaged may have taken place before Ramses II - indeed, Pithom may no
longer have existed in his day. Such a dating is also in conflict with
the biblical statement that the Exodus took place 480 years before the
fourth year of Solomon's reign (1 Kings 6:1. cf also Judges 11:26),
which would date it to c1446BC." (The Israelites, p52)
The Oxford Ency' of Archaeology in the Near East says
"-the so-called "Four hundred-year stela that probably originally stood
in Avaris/Piramesse. - was commissioned by Rameses II, whose family
most likely originated in Avaris; it can be viewed as a kind of
propaganda designed to legitimize the rule of the new dynasty." (Dab'a,
Tell ed, p101) Goshen was between Port Said and Suez.
The homes of the Israelites in the Land of Goshen must
have been close enough to Rameses for the Israelites to go to work and
back each day and to communicate, it seems ridiculous to think that it
took nearly a days journey to get to work each day and how did they
supposedly eat the Passover in their homes in Goshen, spoil the
Egyptians and then leave from Raamses about 40 miles south only about
24 hours later. Perhaps Moses could have left Pharaoh in Raamses and
traveled north collecting the Israelites scattered through the Land of
Goshen as he departed and then turned east towards the sea.
Theophilus says the Israelites were "enslaved by the king
Tethmosis" and expelled by the Pharaoh Amasis. (Autolycus,
Book
3, Ch 20, A-N Vol 2, p117) Thutmous I was king from 1504BC to
1492BC. Rameses I of the 19th dynasty ruled for 2 years
between
about 1293-1291BC. (Claytons Chronicle of Pharaohs) and Ramses II from
1278BC until 1213BC. (The New Ency' of Archaeological Excavations-, Vol
4 p1530, R933.003/STE) giving only about a 300 - 200 year separation
between Thutmous I and Rameses II. "if Rameses was the Pharaoh
of
the Exodus his body should be at the bottom of the Red Sea, not in the
Cairo Museum-" (Diggings, Dec 1999, p6) Although Pharaoh was close by (Ex 14:10) and his "horse" went into the sea, (Ex
15:19) there is no mention that Pharaoh was with his army when they
were drowned. The "overthrow" of Pharaoh in Psalm 136:15 was probably
his defeat not his death.
The Israelites could not have been enslaved for 400 years
under Raamses II and also to have spent 40 years in the Wilderness
before the fall of Jericho! Paul also says in Acts 13:20 "-he gave them
judges about the space of four hundred and fifty years, until Samuel
the prophet." 1240-450=790BC. Too late. This would also have made the
date for the building of the temple to be far too late. Were these contradictions written by the "-inspiration of God-" ? (2
Timothy 3:16) Plaut suggests they experienced "spiritual servitude"
(Commentary, p336) I find it difficult to believe that any children in
my loins could be considered to have done anything, especially if they are never born and so never
exist.
3 DAYS AND 3 NIGHTS
Matt 16:1-4 and Mark 8:11 says that there would be no miraculous sign
from heaven given to that "evil and adulterous generation" to show them
that Jesus was the Messiah although Jesus or a later writer poked fun
at their request by referring to the colour of the sky and the weather
as "a sign from heaven."
Matt 12:40 says Jesus would be three days and three nights in the heart
of the earth. As Jesus would be dead for the three days and nights,
only his Father could bring this sign to pass. Some do not think this
means that Jesus would be in the grave but that he would be in
Jerusalem as Mount Zion is called "the center of the navel of the
earth" (Jubilees 8:19) but Paul is careful to say in Hebrews 12:13 that
Jesus "suffered outside the gate", meaning outside Jerusalem but then
it is argued that it was so close to Jerusalem that it does not matter.
Some people have difficulty believing that Jesus was dead and in the
grave for three days and three nights, having died at the ninth hour
(3pm) on the Preparation day and reviving 72 hours later at 3pm on the
following sabbath.
The expression "three days and three nights" must refer to the time
Jesus was to spend in the tomb otherwise the period between his death
and sunset would include a fourth day.
In a book promoting the teachings of the
Seventh Day
Adventist Ellen White, that is appropriately called "Winds of
Doctrine", C D & R R Standish claim that the three days and
three
nights in Matt 12:40 do not refer to the length of time that Jesus was
in the grave but that it was the length of time that Jesus "hid
himself" just before he was killed. This can be shown to be wrong.
(Refer to the "SIX DAYS" chart) John 12:1 tells us some things that
happened on the sixth day before the Passover and we can follow the
chronological events covering these last six days. John 12:12 goes on
to say "the next day" which was the 2nd of the 6 days (Friday) Jesus
rode the donkey. Following this day that Jesus rode the donkey we now
turn to Mark 11:12 that says "on the morrow" which was the 3rd of the 6
days. This was the weekly sabbath day, the 10th of Nisan and was the
day on which Jesus cursed the fig tree. Following this day Mark 11:20
says, "in the morning" which was on Sunday, (the 4th of the 6 days). On
this day Jesus gave the Olivet prophecy and was still appearing in
public, which leaves only two days (Monday and Tuesday) and not three
days and three nights in which Jesus could have "hid himself". Even if
we wrongly use other days of the week, the number of days that passed
for these events is the same. So then how could the three days and
three nights in Matthew 12:40 be referring to the length of time that
Jesus "hid himself", when there was only two days left, rather than the
three days and three nights really being the length of time that Jesus
was in the grave, (the heart of the earth)? After he rose, he probably
remained in the tomb from 3pm for the next three hours until around
sunset on the sabbath but he did not appear to his friends until the
following morning which was the Wave-sheaf day after the stone had been
rolled away and the angels had appeared. By the use of astronomical
computer calculations we are able to see that in AD31 the Passover
could not have fallen on a Friday, so the two sabbaths did not
co-incide on Saturday as these SDA's believe and it is fictitious to
believe that the coinciding of the two sabbaths could "determine the
exact year" as they claim, because it occurs that way in other
years. So Jesus rose on the third day at 3pm and left Josephs tomb
around sunset having been in the grave, which is the "heart of the
earth" (as Jonah was in the monsters belly) for three days and three nights. As
Jesus died at the ninth hour or 3pm and was dead for 3 days and 3
nights then presumably he rose from the dead at 3pm on Saturday
afternoon. That looks clear,
plain and simple, showing that the "sign of Jonah" just like the other
"signs" or "marks" are periods of time. On the road to Emmaus they did
not say that it was the third day since the "crucifixion" but that it
was the third day since the events that they had been talking about had occurred which
could have also involved the placing of the guards and the sealing of
the tomb which took place on the following day after Jesus
died. Others think that "three days and three nights" was a
Greek expression that could mean that it was only some parts of three
days and three nights, but Jesus spoke in Aramaic and he was quoting
from the Book of Jonah which like the Isaac typology (Gen 22:4, Jub
18:3) was written in Hebrew, not in Greek.
Matt 26:61 says "I am able to build it in three
days" NOT 1 1/2 days.
Matt 27:63 says "Sir we remember how that imposter
said, while he was still alive `AFTER three days I will rise again'.".
Mark 15:29 and John 2:19-30 repeats the same thing.
THE TIME OF THE
RESURRECTION The
time when the Roman soldiers discovered that the tomb had been opened
after the resurrection of Jesus in AD31 varies in different accounts.
The Gospel of Peter says the resurrection was
discovered by the soldiers, during "the night". (Gospel of Peter 9-10)
The Report of Pontius Pilate says it was "the
third hour of the night"
The Syriac Didascalia says "three hours of the
night" (Connolly p182)
The Narrative of Joseph says it was "the fifth hour of the night"
John 20:1 says "Mary Magdalene came to the tomb early, while it was
still dark, and saw the stone had been taken away from the tomb."
Matthew 28:1 agrees with Johns account and says "in the end of the
sabbaths as it began to dawn toward the first of the week," As the
sabbath does not end at dawn it appears to reinforce the plural of
sabbaths, meaning it was near dawn after both the sabbaths of Thursday
and Saturday were past.
Luke 24:1 says the women arrived at "orthrou batheos", "at early dawn"
or "deepest dawn" (Cox p4) but Mark 16:2 says they came "when the sun
had risen.", but some suggest that the Greek "proi" could be translated
as "was dawning.".
Mark 16:9 says "Now when he rose early on the first day of the week,-"
this is thought by some to not have been in the original text but that
it was added on later and which according to "The Resurrection was Not
on Sunday, p8", is in the perfect
tense" and means, "He WAS RISEN."
Eusebius, in his Epistle to Marius, discusses what he considers a
contradiction between Matthew 28:1 and Mark 16:9. He concludes that a
comma should be placed after the word "risen" in Mark 16:9 so the words
"early the first day of the week" tell when Jesus appeared to Mary
Magdalene rather than telling when he rose."(Dellinger, A History of
the Saturday Resurrection p30)
THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO PETER This can be found in Vol 10
of the Ante-Nicene series. Eusebius says "in early days nor in our own
has any church writer made use of their testimony." (3:25) "Among
spurious books - published by heretics - gospels of Peter, Thomas, Matthias -" (3:25) It was written in or before the second
century as Serapion (AD190-211) bishop of Antioch (AD190-203 said that
there were "some things inconsistent" in the Gospel of Peter. (A-N Vol
8, p775) We do not know if the remains of the Gospel of Peter that we
have were the bits considered by Serapion to contain the fact or the
fiction or even if Serapion was correct in his criticism of this
Gospel, which may have suffered some alteration to suit certain tastes
at some earlier time. Eusebius says that Marcian and Docetists in Rhossus upheld its teachings. (6:12) All we have of this
Gospel of Peter was discovered in an Egyptian tomb in AD1886 and begins
at the trial of Jesus and confirms that the Passover day was earlier
than a Friday which supports the view of it not having been in AD30 or
AD33 but in AD31.
WEDNESDAY NISAN 14 AD31 This
was the Passover day also called the day of Preparation (Luke 23:54) on
which Jesus was killed. Peter v2 says that the sabbath was drawing
near, v3 shows it was the day before the Feast of Unleavened Bread.
After Jesus had died (v5) Peter says (v7) that he fasted and sat
mourning and weeping NIGHT AND DAY UNTIL THE SABBATH which shows it was
at least one day before the sabbath day or Saturday. "upon all these things" (v7) would mean after
these things that had occurred on the Passover but as the night after
the Passover day could not be said to be "before" the annual sabbath or
high holy day, it only leaves and so must mean or include the Thursday
night and daylight of Friday before the weekly sabbath which
would indicate that the Passover was on the Wednesday.
THURSDAY NISAN 15
This was the annual High day, the first day of the Feast of Unleavened
Bread, which John 19:31 calls a High day when the chief priests and
pharisees gathered together. (Matt 27:62) Peter (v8) mentions this
meeting of the Scribes, Pharisees and Elders who came to Pilate asking
for soldiers to guard the tomb under a centurion named Petronius. They
gathered at the tomb and rolled the stone into place, perhaps they had
rolled it aside to check that Jesus was still inside. The stone was
sealed and they pitched a tent there and guarded the tomb. Matt
27:62-66 supports the sealing and the setting of the guard being done
on the day following the Passover day which was the 15th of Nisan and
was the first day of the Feast of Unleavened Bread.
FRIDAY NISAN 16 Peter says (v8) "and early in the morning as the sabbath was drawing on
there came a multitude from Jerusalem to see the sealed sepulchre."
This could not have been Sunday morning as it is followed by (v9) "the
night in which the Lord's day was drawing on. In v2 "the sabbath
draweth on" meant that the sabbath was approaching, so in v8 after the
events of sealing the tomb and setting the guard "early in the morning
as the sabbath was drawing on" would also mean that the weekly sabbath
was approaching, so it was on Friday that the multitude from Jerusalem and round about came to see the sealed
sepulchre.
Some have tried to make this account of the Gospel of Peter fit into a
Friday crucifixion, Sunday resurrection fantasy and say that when the
multitude came from Jerusalem "early in the morning as the sabbath was
drawing on," (v8) that "drawing on" means that the sabbath day had
already arrived, but in v2 "sabbath draweth on" meant it was
"approaching" and also in v9 "was drawing on" means it was approaching.
Luke 23:54 uses the same terminology "and that day was the preparation
and the sabbath drew on" (KJV) "began to dawn" (Panin) "was beginning
to dawn" (Phillips) "just dawning" (Moffatt) "was beginning" (RSV) "was
about to begin" (NIV & NEB), so it is clear that they have
changed the meaning in v8 to suit those holding this popular but
false belief.
SATURDAY NISAN 17/18 Anatolius of Alexandria mentions the 17th of Nisan. (Ch 11, A-N, Vol 6,
p147) The stone "rolled of itself' in part v9 on this Saturday night, and the
two men from heaven entered the tomb. The soldiers wake the centurion
and the elders, (v10) they see a certain man descend from heaven and
enter the sepulchre, with this they all "hastened in the night to
Pilate" (v11) "Pilate therefore commanded the centurion and the
soldiers to say nothing. In the Report of Pontius Pilate the Procurator (A-N Vol 8) Jesus is
said to have already risen before 9pm on Saturday night, and other
accounts also show that he was seen on Saturday night.
SUNDAY NISAN 18 The blood brothers of Jesus were told to return to
Galilee. (Matt 28:10) John 20:1 shows that Mary Magdalene came alone to
the tomb early while it was still dark, and saw that the stone had been
taken away, there is no mention of any of the guards who had been
posted there at the tomb for three days to prevent anyone from opening
the grave to ensure that no one stole the body, for the three days
since the Passover on Wednesday had now passed and they appear to have
already left, but if Jesus had been killed on a Friday the guards who
knew how to count to three unlike some modern day theorists, would have
still been on duty. Mary then apparently returned with her friends "at
dawn" (Peter v12) they did not know that the stone had been rolled away
and so asked who would roll the stone away. Mark 16:1 says she was with
Mary the mother of James and Salome, Luke 24:10 adds Joanna and other
women, and when the sun had risen (v2) a man in white linen tells them
to tell Peter (Mark 16:7 and in the Gospel of Peter) The "women feared and fled" (Mark 16:8, Peter v13) This may have been
when some of the guards returned. Matthew 28:11 says "some of the guard
went into the city and told the chief priests all that had taken
place." These guards may not have known what had happened earlier in
the night and/or were waiting until the priests had woken up to tell
them what they had seen.
It should be obvious that this order of events does not fit the
Friday crucifixion, Sunday resurrection story.
Luke 24:21 says "it is now the third day since this happened." "But if
the crucifixion took place on Friday, by no manner of reckoning could
Sunday be made "the third day since" these things were done. (M
Cockrell p3)
Even if we are generous to those who believe in a Friday/Sunday
arrangement and allow that the last few hours or minutes of a Friday
could be considered to be counted as day one, then Saturday is the
second day but as Jesus had risen before the women had arrived "while
it was still dark" (John 20:1) there was no day 3. Likewise between
Friday night and Saturday morning would be night 1, and Saturday night
would be night 2, but there was no night 3.From the first century AD some followers continued to remember the
death of Jesus on the Passover on the 14th of Nisan, while others in
the growing church began to emphasize the Sunday of his appearance,
which they claimed was the day of his resurrection.
SYRIAC DIDASCALIA CHRONOLOGY The Syriac
Didascalia is thought to have been written shortly after AD200 and it seems
the author believed in a Friday Passover death, and has tried to reconcile
the Wednesday Passover evidence with this Friday belief. If he had not
believed that Jesus died on a Friday, his account would only confirm the
details of Jesus dying on a Wednesday Passover. The writer claims the
Passover was erroneously started early by the priests and elders on Tuesday,
"they anticipated the Passover by three days, and kept it on the eleventh of
the moon," (p188). This appears to be the same supper or meal that John
mentions and shows that the Passover was killed late on Tuesday afternoon
and eaten on Tuesday night. Even if this was the observance of the Qumran
sect, or the teaching of the Nazoraeans who Epiphanius says lived "in Beroea
near Coelesyria, in the Decapolis near Pella" with "monasteries in the
vicinity of the Marean marsh, - and how some of them kept the holy week
of Passover (only) after a postponement of it,-" (Panarion, Sect 2, Brill
p115-8) the writer of the Syriac Didascalia tells us that this "erroneous"
time of late on Tuesday afternoon or evening was when Jesus kept it, "on the
third of the week at even I ate my Pascha with you, in the night they
apprehended me".
(Page numbers are from the English translation
by R.H.Connolly. The inserted dates are in the Hebrew month of Nisan)
MON 10 Jesus at Simon the lepers
(p187) Priests and Elders took counsel. Payment made to Judas
was on the 10th of the month (p188)
TUE 11 Jesus ate the "early"
Passover on Tuesday at even, (p188) third day of week
(p184)
TUE 12 (eve) Judas betrays Jesus, Tuesday night, 4th day of week
(p181 & 187) Jesus is arrested (p181
WED 12 Next day (p181, 184) "the fourth of the week," Jesus is
held by Caiaphas the High priest (p181) "the chiefs of people were assembled and took counsel
against him"
THU 13 Next day, - "the fifth of the week" (p181) Jesus is brought to Pilate, and stays in jail that night.
(p181)
FRI 14 Jesus killed (day 1)
FRI 14 (eve) Jesus buried (day
2)
SAT 15 Jesus sleeps (day
3) Mary comes at evening of sabbath, Matt 28:1 (p182)
SUN
16 The resurrection (p183) Jesus goes to Levi's house in the
morning
The gospel writers show that Jesus ate the supper "when
evening had come" (Matt 26:20), "in the evening he cometh with the twelve"
(Mark 14:17) "when the hour was come" (Luke 22:14) "before the feast of the
passover, when Jesus knew that his hour had come" (John 13:1). Because of
the time it would take to have the meal it appears to have been eaten after
sundown, and was like the calendar of the Qumran sect, but by the way it is
presented in the Syriac Didascalia the writer says that this was the evening
at the end of Nisan 11 and the beginning of Nisan 12. Whether the Syriac writer understood
which day, either the Tuesday or the Wednesday was kept as the Passover
day is not clear, as he says it was three days but then only adds two
days to make up the difference, but he is clear that the "Pascha"
supper that Jesus ate was on Tuesday evening, (p184) even though he
said this was erroneous and that the 14th was really on Friday. The
supper was held on the "night in which he was betrayed" (1 Cor 11:23)
which the Syrian writer says was "the fourth day of the week." (p181)
It seems the Wednesday Passover was well known at this time, otherwise
the writer would not have needed to try to explain it away. He also
admits that Friday was "in the midst of their festival of Unleavened
Bread," (p184) which would not be true if the 14th of Nisan had been on
a Friday, although from his point of view of an erroneous start to the
Passover it would appear so to him. To extend the time from the arrest
of Jesus after the "Pascha" supper on Tuesday night until Friday, he
lengthens the time Jesus was held by two days, one day with Caiaphas,
and one day with Pilate, (p181) while other accounts show he was taken
to Pilate the following morning. The earlier chart about the "Last Six
Days" shows there was no time available for the custody and trial
to continue for two extra days. As Matt 27:1-2 says "When the morning
was come - delivered him to Pontius Pilate" Mark 15:1 says "And
straightway in the morning - delivered him to Pilate", Luke 22:66 says
"And as soon as it was day, - 23:1 and led him to Pilate" John 18:28
says "it was early" and also shows that they had not yet eaten the
Passover. "they themselves went not into the judgment hall, lest they
should be defiled; but that they might eat the passover." The writer
also tries to explain how three days and three nights could be
reconciled between Friday and the time of the resurrection. (p182) He
almost admits that the resurrection occurred on the sabbath according
to Matthew (28:1), "At even on the sabbath, when the first day of the
week drew on, came Mary Magdalene and the other Mary to see the tomb,
And there was a great earthquake: for an angel of the Lord came down
and rolled away the stone. -And again (there was) the day of the
sabbath; and then three hours of the night after the sabbath, wherein
our Lord slept." (p182) This agrees with The Report of Pontius Pilate
which also says it was "the third hour of the night". He also agrees
with John 20:1 that the resurrection was discovered when it was dark
rather than on Sunday morning by saying, "In the night, therefore, when
the first day of the week drew on, He appeared to Mary Magdalene and to
Mary the daughter of James;" (p183) The writer may have been familiar
with the complete story as told in the Gospel of Peter which was
probably available at the time he wrote, but of which we only have a
small portion today, where the use of "drew on" can be shown to mean
"was approaching", and if applied to Matthew 28:1 would mean the women
arrived at the tomb near the end of the sabbath, when the first day of the week "was
approaching" and found it empty. Luke 23:54 also shows that "drew on" means
approaching. The idea that it was the third hour of the night probably came
from the reports of when the open tomb was reported by the soldiers or
whatever, but it must be admitted that this contradicts Mark 16:2 which says
the women "came to the sepulchre at the rising of the sun", "kai lian proi
te mia ton sabbaton epcontai epi to mnemeion anateilantos tou eliou" but the
Word Biblical Commentary (226.5/BEA) says in Note b on p366 "proi
is variously interpreted in the Gospels. Mark defines it 'the sun having
risen' (16:2), Luke, 'at deep dawn' (24:1), Matthew with an ambiguous
phrase which may mean 'as it was dawning towards the first day' (28:1).
Luke 23:55 says that these were the women from Galilee, Mary Magdalene,
Joanna and Mary the mother of James and others (Luke 24:10) and they
seem to show no knowledge of any events having occurred the previous
evening. Luke 24:1 says that it was "very early in the morning" but
John 20:1 does not say that it was morning but only says that "it was
yet dark" probably suggesting that it was towards morning, so it seems
we cannot be absolutely sure what the facts of the story were that the
women told the disciples, and if the account in Matthew is more
accurate than the others. Sadly many details of the early accounts of
the Wednesday Passover have been lost. Was it the result of their
deliberate destruction by those who opposed such views, or perhaps from
neglect due to the difficulties its supporters had in passing on these
accounts which were not faced by those who believed in a Friday
passover. (omer)
GTA Tape Library
PO Box 345, North Sydney NSW 2060 A ustralia